Thanks Daniel, It works! Daniel Westermann-Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006-08-10 03:30:51 +0100, Nagarajan M wrote:> [error] Caught exception in engine "Can't locate object method "store_session_da> ta" via package "MyApp" at C:/Perl/site/lib/Catalyst\Plugin\Session.pm line 131."> > MyA
On 2006-08-10 03:30:51 +0100, Nagarajan M wrote:
> [error] Caught exception in engine "Can't locate object method
> "store_session_da
> ta" via package "MyApp" at C:/Perl/site/lib/Catalyst\Plugin\Session.pm line
> 131."
>
> MyApp.pm loaded plugins
> ===
>
> use Catalyst
On 8/9/06, Nagarajan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using **Cache::FileCache** since
> **Session::Store::FastMmap** is not supported in Win32.
Use C::P::Session::Store::File and your problems should be solved.
-Nilson Santos F. Jr.
___
List: Catal
On 8/9/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Point out that everybody on http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/wiki/LiveApplications
> disagrees :)
I haven't stumbled upon this page before and I'm sort of amazed. I
never thought there were so many public facing sites using Catalyst. I
really think
Hi All, I am trying out the authentication examples provided in the manual page. I am facing issue in storing the session. When I submit the login request, it was able to authenticate the user but its giving exception when storing session. I here by attaching the debug message. Can somebody h
On 8/9/06, Joe Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Last I tried, Cygwin had some issues (Matt had been wrestling with
> it). Is Catinabox working in Cygwin, or will everything just work in
> Cygwin? Native vs cygwin doesn't matter.
I don't know about Cygwin - Catalyst runs alright natively u
Hi folks:
I want to be able to work on my stuff regardless of whether I am
booted into windows or linux on my laptop. Most of the time is spent in
Linux, but I need to use windows for some things every now and then.
I have Catalyst operational on the laptop under SuSE 10.1. Works
great
On 09/08/06, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By obsessively marketing Catalyst. Ideally build several web apps that are> really, really useful (c.f. Basecamp) & market the hell out of them.>...%]) Pretty much, Basecamp is like every other piece of proprietary
software -- they already
* Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-09 18:55]:
> (Think about all the infrastructure that CPAN gives you --
> local mirrors, CPAN testers, rt.cpan.org, mailing lists, etc.
> Does the Comprehensive Ruby Archive Network have that? :)
There’s RubyForge, though, which offers some services
:)
I meant for CRAN to associate with "crayon" which are toys that little
kids play with :) Same idea though.
Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
>> etc. Does the Comprehensive Ruby Archive Network have that? :)
>>
>
> Do you mean the Comprehensive Ruby Archive Portal?
>
> Sorry, couldn't resist :-)
>
> etc. Does the Comprehensive Ruby Archive Network have that? :)
Do you mean the Comprehensive Ruby Archive Portal?
Sorry, couldn't resist :-)
--
Med venlig hilsen
Kaare Rasmussen, Jasonic
Jasonic Telefon: +45 3816 2582
Nordre Fasanvej 12
2000 Frederiksberg Email: [EMAIL
Hey. To keep things more consistent, the canonical hostname for dev is now dev.catalystframework.org. That means you will have to update your checkouts. For svk it will look something like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] catalyst]$ svk mirror --relocate //mirror/Catalyst http://dev.catalystframework.org/r
At first glance, C::M::File seems to cover it. It exposes the
Class::Path::File object, which includes a stat method, which was one of
the big ones.
I'll dig around with that in my copious freetime (haha) and see if I can
come up with an addition feature list and/or some patches.
-D
> -Orig
That looks like it pretty well covers my need.
Only other thing I'd find at all useful is a File::Type method, but I
can easily call that as part of my wrapper model. It doesn't seem as
useful in the generic one.
Thanks again,
Dylan
> -Original Message-
> From: Ash Berlin [mailto:[EMA
> Any features missing from that that you think you'd want?
A quick glance doesn't reveal how slurp is implemented, but hopefully
you're using sysread.
As for features, my app needs (and has implemented) atomic writes,
extended filesystem attributes, ctime, mtime, etc. When I get a chance,
I'll
What other features do you desire?
> Obviously, it would need to be more generic and more full-featured than
> what's being used in the fs-based applications I've seen so far, but it
> needn't start with everything available.
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Oh, huh. I just was looking for something like that before I posted and
didn't find that one. Oops.
I'll take a look, thanks.
-Dylan
> -Original Message-
> From: Ash Berlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 1:08 PM
> To: The elegant MVC web framework
> Subje
Catalyst::Model::File:
http://search.cpan.org/~ash/Catalyst-Model-File-0.02/lib/Catalyst/Model/File.pm
Based on Path::Class, so its platform independent.
Any features missing from that that you think you'd want?
Ash
Dylan Vanderhoof wrote:
> I've noticed a few people posting about fielsystem
I've noticed a few people posting about fielsystem models under their
Catalyst applications lately, which makes a good deal of sense for many
applications.
However, when I look at code, each one has the filesystem calls fairly
integrated with the model portion of the application.
I'll admit I'm b
Feel free to add "AngerWhale" (unless you think the name is too stupid
:)
http://www.jrock.us/trac/blog_software is the URL.
I also gave a talk about this program at YAPC this year, so if you
wanted to add my slides to the "Catalyst Slides" section, that would
be perfectly OK with me.
http://www
On 8/9/06, John Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/9/06, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A seperate but similar list for applications built on Catalyst would be nice too (the distinction being apps people can download and deploy, versus live running businesses/organizations who might or
On 8/9/06, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A seperate but similar list for applications built on Catalyst would be nice too (the distinction being apps people can download and deploy, versus live running businesses/organizations who might or might not share their Cat-based app source).
The
On 8/9/06, Kenny Gatdula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:> One of the wiki janitors should be able to set you up with access. *looks> round* ... sing out, gents, I've forgotten who you are. Again. Sorry.Consider it done.
http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/wiki/LiveApplicationsA seperate b
Matt S Trout wrote:
> One of the wiki janitors should be able to set you up with access. *looks
> round* ... sing out, gents, I've forgotten who you are. Again. Sorry.
Consider it done. http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/wiki/LiveApplications
Kenny
___
Li
Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Matt S Trout wrote:
>
>> Point out that everybody on
>> http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/wiki/LiveApplications
>> disagrees :)
>
> Wow, another invisible wiki page. Why isn't that linked directly and
> prominently off the Catalyst homepage ?
It's linked off
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Matt S Trout wrote:
> Point out that everybody on http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/wiki/LiveApplications
> disagrees :)
Wow, another invisible wiki page. Why isn't that linked directly and
prominently off the Catalyst homepage ?
How do I get a login to add a site to that page, or
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Brian Kirkbride wrote:
> I'd rather have the design decisions for my chosen framework made in
> consideration of the pragmatic than the marketing side of things.
Actually Rails is an emergent framework that's been rolled out from
Basecamp. That's why it has functionality holes
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> More of my 2 cents :)
>
>> Rails is easy because, it would appear, it
>> sacrifices TMTOWTDI - they lost me right there.
>>
>
> Yup. And from a technical standpoint, rails isn't all that good.
> ActiveRecord? Great for blogs and Basecamp, bad for everything else.
More of my 2 cents :)
> Rails is easy because, it would appear, it
> sacrifices TMTOWTDI - they lost me right there.
>
Yup. And from a technical standpoint, rails isn't all that good.
ActiveRecord? Great for blogs and Basecamp, bad for everything else.
Even my boss picked up on this immed
Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
> Make it really really easy to get started for people who don't know much
> perl.
>
Here we get into a tricky debate about ease-of-use vs flexibility and
performance. While not mutually exclusive, it is very difficult and
> By obsessively marketing Catalyst. Ideally build several web apps that are
> really, really useful (c.f. Basecamp) & market the hell out of them.
>
I have to use Basecamp at work. Frankly, it's a useless piece of junk.
Yes, it has some shiny AJAX crap... but it's pretty buggy. (For
exampl
Rodney Broom wrote:
> From: "Jesse Sheidlower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> I'm having a weird problem with one (and only one) of my Cat
>> apps; it works under the built-in server, but something is
>> happening under Apache13 that messes up...
>
> Another case of something working under myapp_ser
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/8/7/ruby-on-rails-will-ship-with-os-x-10-5-leopard
By obsessively marketing Catalyst. Ideally build several web apps that are
really, really useful (c.f. Basecamp) & market the hell out of them.
Make it really re
33 matches
Mail list logo
