I had this as well.IIRC, there was a .pm file that had "use base TT something or other something"The fix was to put "use something or other somethingsomething"before the use base line.
That is, "use" before "use base"Look at the file that is causing the error...2006/8/27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL
> Axkit2 looks like it'll be a lovely candidate for a production-quality
> scalable standalone server, although it's a single-process affair with
> optional forking so we'll need to figure out how to manage that
> appropriately to maximise performance.
Do you (or anyone else) know any benchmark or
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Len Jaffe wrote:
>> Isn't that the whole point of this architecture.
>>
>> The lightweight daemon that listens on port 80 either serves static
>> content,
>> or asks the heavy app server process to do some work.
>>
>> That way you have a whole bunch of light processes servi
FYI, I asked about this in the journal comments and it sounds like
shipping off database queries (and presumably any other blocking I/O) to
a separate mod_perl/PPerl/whatever is the likely route.
http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=32713&cid=49605
- Perrin
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> FYI, I asked about this in the journal comments and it sounds like
> shipping off database queries (and presumably any other blocking I/O) to
> a separate mod_perl/PPerl/whatever is the likely route.
That's not really what he says; the idea is to have things like database
Matt S Trout wrote:
> Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> FYI, I asked about this in the journal comments and it sounds like
>> shipping off database queries (and presumably any other blocking I/O) to
>> a separate mod_perl/PPerl/whatever is the likely route.
>
> That's not really what he says; the idea is
> Some interesting food for thought for the weekend. How many of you
> saw the launch of Amazon's EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) service beta on
> Wednesday?
>
> http://www.amazon.com/b/ref=sc_fe_c_1_3435361_1/103-7963297-2261459?ie=UTF8&node=201590011&no=3435361&me=A36L942TSJ2AJA
>
> A machine imag
> > Some interesting food for thought for the weekend. How many of you
> > saw the launch of Amazon's EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) service beta on
> > Wednesday?
> >
> > http://www.amazon.com/b/ref=sc_fe_c_1_3435361_1/103-7963297-2261459?ie=UTF8&node=201590011&no=3435361&me=A36L942TSJ2AJA
> >
> > A
