I'm wondering if it has any bad side effects to have a TT macro which is set to
$c->uri_for. If I'm remembering previous posts on this topic correctly, calling
uri_for() repeatedly has quite a big impact on performance which really matters
most for my current application. I have this in a global ma
Hi,
In the course of a project I'm working on, I found it useful to
"reset" chained actions. It would work like this:
. assume that you have a chain like /company/ID/copywrongs
. and in certain situations you want a alternative environment for
the chain, like this:
/approve/compa
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:42:28PM +0100, Ash Berlin wrote:
> Fernan Aguero wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to overload (or would it be override?) the
> > merge_session_to_user sub in
> > Catalyst::Plugin::Session::PerUser to be able to guide the
> > hash merge (i.e. create new hash value keys for
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:43:30AM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote:
> I'm wondering if it has any bad side effects to have a TT macro which is set
> to
> $c->uri_for. If I'm remembering previous posts on this topic correctly,
> calling
> uri_for() repeatedly has quite a big impact on performance which
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:13:59AM +0100, Pedro Melo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the course of a project I'm working on, I found it useful to
> "reset" chained actions. It would work like this:
>
> . assume that you have a chain like /company/ID/copywrongs
> . and in certain situations you want a a
On 8/7/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why we optimised the living crap out of uri_for.
>
> It's more than 10x faster than it used to be.
Great to hear that. Does it also apply to uri_with?
--
Zbigniew Lukasiak
http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/
___
thanks. what Michael said covers it, I think - I searched POST in the
docs and didn't find, but perhaps too hastily ... :-)
On 8/6/07, Jonathan T. Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:24:43PM +0200, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
> > I want to do this by just making the POST re
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:33:04PM -0700, Aditya Verma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you very much for all your valuable comments at appreciate your quick
> response.
>
> I have one more query.
> I have implemented a Plugin. How can I call a plugin method from controller
> outside of the controller
--- Aditya Verma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you very much for all your valuable comments
> at appreciate your quick
> response.
>
> I have one more query.
> I have implemented a Plugin. How can I call a plugin
> method from controller
> outside of the controller methods.
>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:10:09PM +, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> On 8/7/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's why we optimised the living crap out of uri_for.
> >
> > It's more than 10x faster than it used to be.
>
> Great to hear that. Does it also apply to uri_with?
Nobody
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:33:04PM -0700, Aditya Verma wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thank you very much for all your valuable comments at appreciate your quick
> > response.
> >
> > I have one more query.
> > I have implemented a Plugin. How can I call a plugin method from controller
> > outside
11 matches
Mail list logo