[Catalyst] Framework Confusion: Catalyst, Jifty, Woodstock (Mojo)? 'Sup?

2006-08-22 Thread Hugh Lampert
Experts: Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduring better-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/ framework than Jifty or (Woodstock|Mojo)? Seeing these other frameworks mentioned online - just curious. -- Hugh --

[Catalyst] Catalyst upgrade from 5.69 to 5.7001: many subroutines redefined

2006-08-18 Thread Hugh Lampert
I beg the indulgence of the list if this has all been discussed already. I tried to search my archived list copies but didn't see anything directly applicable, and since I multi-task as the DBA here in the office I can't dedicate too much time to head scratching over this I recently had so

[Catalyst] Up-to-date Scaffolding/CRUD examples?

2006-07-11 Thread Hugh Lampert
I have to add some page based displays of list data (distribution lists, defined alert lists, etc.) to my Catalyst application. I'm using Catalyst 5.6 and DBIx::Class. A lot of the Scaffolding/CRUD examples out there seem to be targeted toward Class::DBI and/or older versions of Catalyst. Be

Re: [Catalyst] FastCGI is Weak Sauce

2006-06-30 Thread Hugh Lampert
A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-29 23:20]: > >> Silly complaint or not, people running mod_perl already have >> this covered, since the normal mode of deployment is to run a >> static web server and proxy via HTTP over to a mod_perl server >> for all dynamic s

[Catalyst] Perl Flavors (was PPM vs CPAN)

2006-06-30 Thread Hugh Lampert
Carl Franks wrote: > You may want to look into Vanilla / Strawberry perl as an alternative > to ActivePerl. > It includes the mingw (gcc) compiler and nmake, and the perl included > is compiled from scratch with mingw, rather than ms compilers. > Thanks, I will look into this for my next project.

[Catalyst] PPM vs CPAN in a Windows Context

2006-06-30 Thread Hugh Lampert
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: >> OK, don't mean to sound like a whiner here, and I haven't spent any time >> investigating the various GCC packages, but it's making me laugh that >> it's been suggested I download a C++ development package just so I can >> get my perl modules to install. >

Re: [Catalyst] PPM vs CPAN

2006-06-29 Thread Hugh Lampert
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: > On 6/28/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on >> the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a >> good win32 binary GCC p

Re: [Catalyst] PPM vs CPAN

2006-06-28 Thread Hugh Lampert
Matt S Trout wrote: > > Once you've got CPAN configured and nmake and a gcc installed, > > http://shadowcatsystems.co.uk/static/cat-install > > will install Catalyst itself plus deps hands-off via CPAN (with a > little help from ppm on windows) > Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem.

Re: [Catalyst] PPM vs CPAN

2006-06-28 Thread Hugh Lampert
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: > On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just to let you know something amusing - I tried the "preconfigured" >> CPAN.pm that comes with ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. First, it took about 10 >> minutes to fig