-Original Message-
From: mla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:25 AM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
So part of me would like to see a more Rails-like layer on top of
Catalyst.
Sounds like you really want to write a Rails-like layer for Catalyst!
Disclaimer:
Andy Grundman wrote:
-k is a hack and you shouldn't use it unless you need to do IE
testing. Real web servers do not have a problem with keep-alive.
You may also want to try Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::POE instead. :)
What are the advantages of Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::POE compared to the
-Original Message-
From: Jan Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:06 PM
To: Lampert, Hugh
Subject: ActivePerl DBI and Catalyst
Hi Hugh,
I've been pointed to your message on the Catalyst list:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/12403?do
: Jan Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:13 AM
To: Lampert, Hugh
Subject: Re: ActivePerl DBI and Catalyst
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:52:41 -0500, Lampert, Hugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Hugh,
I'm impressed that ActiveState is interested in solving this issue
Thanks, I force installed the DBI module from CPAN and that has eliminated the
error.
Is there something easy that I can do (like tell ActiveState something specific
about their version of DBI), that would make their PPM version stop doing this?
Hugh Lampert
IT Specialist
Information
Sorry to bother the list with this but I'm about to pull my hair out (or
switch my app over to Instant Rails - joke...). Here's the scoop:
I have a test application I've been working on for a long time. We run
on Windows, we will NOT be using a Linux platform for this regardless of
how easy it
