Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple => CatalystX::RoseIntegrator

2007-09-24 Thread Peter Karman
On 09/23/2007 10:36 AM, Alexandre Jousset wrote: > Hello list, > > Following the preceding discussion, I scheduled > Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple for deletion on CPAN and uploaded the > same module under the name CatalystX::RoseIntegrator. Please wait the > time required for it to

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-23 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Matt S Trout a écrit : I think you should just rewrite the damn thing to use Controller::Rose. That seems like a much better idea to me since Peter Karman's code is already pretty stable and provides most of the things you need. Like what? Just provide a different interface on top.

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-23 Thread Matt S Trout
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Alexandre Jousset wrote: > Peter Karman a écrit : > >Alexandre Jousset wrote on 9/20/07 11:41 AM: > >>I'm sure I haven't your experience but for me (and also for Peter > >>Karman, C::C::Rose author), the suffix "::Simple" (suggested by him) > >>means

[Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple => CatalystX::RoseIntegrator

2007-09-23 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Hello list, Following the preceding discussion, I scheduled Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple for deletion on CPAN and uploaded the same module under the name CatalystX::RoseIntegrator. Please wait the time required for it to show up. I gave it version 0.02 because of this and a f

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-21 Thread Peter Karman
On 09/21/2007 01:29 AM, Alexandre Jousset wrote: > > My only concern is that a search on CPAN with "Catalyst" and "Rose" > should make it show up. I believe that search.cpan.org will search the content of all POD, so if you have 'catalyst' and 'rose' in your POD anywhere, you'd get hits.

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-20 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Peter Karman a écrit : Alexandre Jousset wrote on 9/20/07 11:41 AM: I'm sure I haven't your experience but for me (and also for Peter Karman, C::C::Rose author), the suffix "::Simple" (suggested by him) means "Take all that [what already exists, i.e. Catalyst and Rose] and make it simpler

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-20 Thread Peter Karman
Alexandre Jousset wrote on 9/20/07 11:41 AM: Hello Matt, Matt S Trout wrote: Feel free to ask me any question you want. Why haven't you submitted patches to the existing C-C-Rose? Any module called '-Simple' usually means "there was an existing module that worked but I'm too lazy t

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-20 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Hello Matt, Matt S Trout wrote: Feel free to ask me any question you want. Why haven't you submitted patches to the existing C-C-Rose? Any module called '-Simple' usually means "there was an existing module that worked but I'm too lazy to patch it" - please justify why that is

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-20 Thread Matt S Trout
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:16:56PM +0200, Alexandre Jousset wrote: > Hello list, > > I just uploaded on CPAN the module : > > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Controller-Rose-Simple/ > > that makes use of Rose::* easier ith Catalyst. > > It is version 0.01, so use wi

[Catalyst] Catalyst::Controller::Rose::Simple

2007-09-20 Thread Alexandre Jousset
Hello list, I just uploaded on CPAN the module : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Controller-Rose-Simple/ that makes use of Rose::* easier ith Catalyst. It is version 0.01, so use with care and development environment use only. I know, documentation and tests are