Re: [Catalyst] Framework Confusion: Catalyst, Jifty, Woodstock (Mojo)? 'Sup?

2006-08-22 Thread Matt S Trout
Hugh Lampert wrote: > Experts: Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduring > better-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/ framework than Jifty or > (Woodstock|Mojo)? > > Seeing these other frameworks mentioned online - just curious. Catalyst is designed to be flexible, extensible and basicall

Re: [Catalyst] Framework Confusion: Catalyst, Jifty, Woodstock (Mojo)? 'Sup?

2006-08-22 Thread Brandon Black
On 8/22/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Experts:  Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduringbetter-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/  framework than Jifty or(Woodstock|Mojo)?Seeing these other frameworks mentioned online - just curious. Well, for one thing, Jifty is the only framew

Re: [Catalyst] Framework Confusion: Catalyst, Jifty, Woodstock (Mojo)? 'Sup?

2006-08-22 Thread Jonathan Rockway
Hugh Lampert wrote: > Experts: Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduring > better-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/ framework than Jifty or > (Woodstock|Mojo)? Only you can answer these questions. Try them out, and use what you like. Catalyst's advantage is flexibility. It can do any

[Catalyst] Framework Confusion: Catalyst, Jifty, Woodstock (Mojo)? 'Sup?

2006-08-22 Thread Hugh Lampert
Experts: Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduring better-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/ framework than Jifty or (Woodstock|Mojo)? Seeing these other frameworks mentioned online - just curious. -- Hugh --