Max Afonov wrote:
> If Java-trapped Eclipse is that tool, then be it.
Eclipse runs perfectly with GCJ (compiled to native code) or GIJ
(interpreted). The Java Trap doesn't apply to Eclipse.
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehto
TCB wrote:
I don't use OS X but one caveat with Eclipse if you decide to check it out, you
need to use Sun java, not anything else. Getting rid of the gnu java emulation
and getting 'real' java on a debian box was a minor pain, while getting it onto
an OpenBSD machine was easy but took a very lon
I think things like Aptana are the real strength of Eclipse. The same IDE can be
used to check javascript and html, pure java apps, Perl code, talk to cvs/svn,
connect to an Oracle database, etc. and so on. For many, many people that alone
makes it a better choice than Komodo or pretty much anythin
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:34:31PM +, Ash Berlin wrote:
>
> For vim I use the MiniBuffExplorer plugin and split windows - give you
> tab like interface, and is faster than gvim7's own tabs IMO.
>
Dare I mention that Eclipse has a perl personality now-a-days.
Joe
--
Josef Karthauser ([EMAI
Hello!
I use a strange combination of vim+gvim+gedit but I find it fits my
needs perfectly. Some developers in my company who want something
resembling a good-looking IDE use Aptana (Eclipse based), which ain't bad.
Michele.
--
Michele Beltrame
http://www.varlogarthas.net/
ICQ# 76660101
Informa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in
some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs
and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all,
right? [grin]
With that out of the way, what IDE or editor
Max Afonov wrote:
>
> Emacs and Eclipse, and even vim to a certain degree, are platforms
> that can be either used as simple editors, or morphed by the user into
> comprehensive development environments. Unfortunately for many, these
> platforms are like DIY remote-controlled car kits: assembly is
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Exactly. Somewhat like this:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
We could be slipping off topic here because I was talking about TextMate
not being free as in parking as opposed to Free as in beer. That is not
to say that I do not subscribe anymore to this
"Max Afonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've never had this issue.
> I worked with a guy who used it for his everyday coding. He seemed to have
> gotten used to 5-minute delays when saving a file. *sigh*
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>>
I worked with a guy who used it for his everyday coding. He seemed to
have gotten used to 5-minute delays when saving a file. *sigh*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Ian Docherty wrote:
Have you looked at Ul
Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote:
> "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>>> Ian Docherty wrote:
Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for
Linux)
http://www.ultraedit.com/
I think it gives you everyth
Ian Docherty wrote:
> Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for
> Linux)
>
I am a long time devotee of EditPad Pro, which DOES have a (non-free)
Linux version. I'm just about as handy with vim, since I spend a lot of
time working over ssh, but when it comes down to ha
"Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>> Ian Docherty wrote:
>>> Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for
>>> Linux)
>>>
>>> http://www.ultraedit.com/
>>>
>>> I think it gives you everything you listed and more.
>>>
>>> Regards
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Ian Docherty wrote:
>> Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for
>> Linux)
>>
>> http://www.ultraedit.com/
>>
>> I think it gives you everything you listed and more.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ian Docherty
>
> Last time I tried it, I hated it. Felt l
Max Afonov wrote:
> ...TextMate is a great application that is very much in keeping with
> core Mac UI guidelines. I tried using it for a few projects, and I have
> to say that it's excellent. But here's what I don't like about TextMate:
> it's not free. Not meaning to sound cheap and nitpicking, b
Ian Docherty wrote:
> Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for
> Linux)
>
> http://www.ultraedit.com/
>
> I think it gives you everything you listed and more.
>
> Regards
> Ian Docherty
Last time I tried it, I hated it. Felt like the interface was too
busy...and fr
Have you looked at UltraEdit for Windows (unfortunately no version for
Linux)
http://www.ultraedit.com/
I think it gives you everything you listed and more.
Regards
Ian Docherty
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Max Afonov wrote:
Now the funny part is that you did NOT recommend Eclips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in
> some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs
> and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all,
> right? [grin]
>
> With that out of the way, what IDE or e
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I'm really really picky about my editors. I've used Textpad on Windows
forever, and recently SCite. What I look for in an editor is that the
toolbar is slim, but I have a lot of options under hood.
[snip]
Eclipse was always slow for me.. compared to
Textpad/Scite.
Max Afonov wrote:
> Now the funny part is that you did NOT recommend Eclipse after all!
I'm really really picky about my editors. I've used Textpad on Windows
forever, and recently SCite. What I look for in an editor is that the
toolbar is slim, but I have a lot of options under hood.
For me, tho
Now the funny part is that you did NOT recommend Eclipse after all!
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Max Afonov wrote:
A few of my fellow Perl developers here have adopted Eclipse as their
IDE of choice. Coupled with http://e-p-i-c.sf.net/ and it's fabulous
CVS/SVN support it's a perfect tool for
I've been messing a bit with this of late myself. I've tried using Eclipse
(www.eclipse.org) for a while with the (quite nice) Perl plug-in, mostly because
it let me work on both XP boxes and *nix machines pretty easily with a nearly
identical user experience. Also, if you have to work with databas
A few of my fellow Perl developers here have adopted Eclipse as their
IDE of choice. Coupled with http://e-p-i-c.sf.net/ and it's fabulous
CVS/SVN support it's a perfect tool for those who like to see 'the big
picture'.
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hesitate to ask
Max Afonov wrote:
> A few of my fellow Perl developers here have adopted Eclipse as their
> IDE of choice. Coupled with http://e-p-i-c.sf.net/ and it's fabulous
> CVS/SVN support it's a perfect tool for those who like to see 'the big
> picture'.
EPIC. Never heard of it. ;-)
http://e-p-i-c.sourc
I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in
some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs
and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all,
right? [grin]
With that out of the way, what IDE or editor works well for you?
My default
On Nov 14, 2006, at 8:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in
some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs
and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all,
right? [grin]
With that out of th
Eclipse might do you with the Perl plugin (EPIC) and other plugins (subversion for example)Unfortunately, there isn't a plugin for catalyst as there is for RoR :((that's a disguised hint at anyone who's interested in writing one) ;) lol[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hesitate to ask this question becaus
Ash Berlin wrote:
> For vim I use the MiniBuffExplorer plugin and split windows - give you
> tab like interface, and is faster than gvim7's own tabs IMO.
emacs' iswitchb mode is much nicer, as is cperl-mode :)
Also, you can test your web applications right in your editor, thanks
the the built-in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in
some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs
and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all,
right? [grin]
With that out of the way, what IDE or editor works
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I hesitate to ask this question because it seems to often result in
> some juvenille flame war. Everyone is different, with different needs
> and preferences. That's why we have choices. It's Perl after all,
> right? [grin]
>
> With that out of the way, what IDE or ed
30 matches
Mail list logo
