Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> Anyone here using M$$QL as their backend? If so, how's that going?
> (That's all we're allowed to use here, and apparently it works fine with
> PHP. But I've never had good luck with non-win32 perl and MSSQL, so I'd
> like to know what others are up to.)
We are using t
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Black
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
7:54 PM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] MSSQL and
Catalyst
On 8/23/06, Alan Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wro
On 8/23/06, Alan Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had some time so I decided to upgrade my app and see if I could takeadvantage of all this. No joy. I'm still getting bind parameters. Infobelow. Any ideas?Thank you!- AlanVersion:
~/birdweb/trunk/BirdWeb-Admin > perldoc -l DBIx::Class | xar
notes]);
__PACKAGE__->set_primary_key( 'id' );
1;
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Black
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:31 AM
To: The elegant MVC web framework
Subject: Re: [Catalyst] MSSQL and Catal
On 8/14/06, Alan Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone here using M$$QL as their backend?I'm using it as one part of an app. The app is very lightly used so I can'tgive you any performance information, but here's what I've done.1) Running NetBSD, using DBD::Sybase and FreeTDS.
2) FreeTDS has
On 8/14/06, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This solves both the bind variable issue and the prepare_cached issue for DBD::Sybase+FreeTDS+MSSQL.Actually, I went back and double-checked this, and it doesn't have the code to prevent the memory issues w/ prepare_cached. It was meant to, but
Anyone here using M$$QL as their backend?
I'm using it as one part of an app. The app is very lightly used so I can't
give you any performance information, but here's what I've done.
1) Running NetBSD, using DBD::Sybase and FreeTDS.
2) FreeTDS has a limitation in that it doesn't support bind
> Circa 08/14/2006 11:18 AM, Jonathan
Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone here using M$$QL as their
backend? If so, how's that going?
> (That's all we're allowed to use
here, and apparently it works fine with
> PHP. But I've never had good
luck with non-win32 perl and MSSQL, so I'd
>
Anyone here using M$$QL as their backend? If so, how's that going?
(That's all we're allowed to use here, and apparently it works fine with
PHP. But I've never had good luck with non-win32 perl and MSSQL, so I'd
like to know what others are up to.)
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
___
