On 6/30/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that's the point - that AS has switched to gcc and it's *generally*
> preferable to use the same compiler as your perl binary was built with.
There's nothing in the release notes indicating that they've done this
(they've recently switc
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Don't do that. Bad things will happen. Always compiled your modules with
>> the same compiler used for the perl install itself on Windows. To that
>> point, you could compile perl in .NET, then do
On 6/30/06, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't do that. Bad things will happen. Always compiled your modules with
> the same compiler used for the perl install itself on Windows. To that
> point, you could compile perl in .NET, then do the modules that way too.
FUD.
VS.NET 200
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> The problem is that I never managed to get Apache to run mod_perl
> properly without crashing. But maybe that's just me, since I've seen
> other people reporting the opposite. But it works fine enough for my
> current purposes under Apache::Registry.
We've
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The hassle is that we are a Windows shop and my boss only cares about
>> results. To roll out an .ASP application is only a matter of using the
>> resources that are already installed in the development
On 6/30/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The hassle is that we are a Windows shop and my boss only cares about
> results. To roll out an .ASP application is only a matter of using the
> resources that are already installed in the development environment and
> on the production server
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
>> OK, don't mean to sound like a whiner here, and I haven't spent any time
>> investigating the various GCC packages, but it's making me laugh that
>> it's been suggested I download a C++ development package just so I can
>> get my perl modules to install.
>
You may want to look into Vanilla / Strawberry perl as an alternative
to ActivePerl.
It includes the mingw (gcc) compiler and nmake, and the perl included
is compiled from scratch with mingw, rather than ms compilers.
http://win32.perl.org/wiki/index.php?title=Vanilla_Perl
The files are here (get
Hugh Lampert wrote:
> I mean I only want to finish my small app. My boss is going to split his
> gut when I tell him first I need to download a C++ dev package so I can
> install the application framework that actually is written in perl.
> Looks like I'll be sticking to whatever Catalyst modul
On 6/29/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, don't mean to sound like a whiner here, and I haven't spent any time
> investigating the various GCC packages, but it's making me laugh that
> it's been suggested I download a C++ development package just so I can
> get my perl modules to i
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 6/28/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
>> the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
>> good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygw
On 6/28/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
> the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
> good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygwin or other
> "environments"? the CPAN modu
Hugh Lampert wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
>> Once you've got CPAN configured and nmake and a gcc installed,
>>
>> http://shadowcatsystems.co.uk/static/cat-install
>>
>> will install Catalyst itself plus deps hands-off via CPAN (with a
>> little help from ppm on windows)
>>
> Err, yes... gcc... see
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:09:13PM -0400, Hugh Lampert wrote:
> Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem. Hate to impose on
> the members of the list, but can anyone point me in the direction of a
> good win32 binary GCC package that doesn't require Cygwin or other
> "environments"?
Matt S Trout wrote:
>
> Once you've got CPAN configured and nmake and a gcc installed,
>
> http://shadowcatsystems.co.uk/static/cat-install
>
> will install Catalyst itself plus deps hands-off via CPAN (with a
> little help from ppm on windows)
>
Err, yes... gcc... seems to be a bit of a problem.
Hugh Lampert wrote:
> Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
>> On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Just to let you know something amusing - I tried the "preconfigured"
>>> CPAN.pm that comes with ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. First, it took about 10
>>> minutes to figure out I neede
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to let you know something amusing - I tried the "preconfigured"
>> CPAN.pm that comes with ActiveState Perl 5.8.8. First, it took about 10
>> minutes to figure out I needed to type "Enter+Space" i
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for responding! Perhaps you can forward this to the mailing
>> list, as I am unable to reach it from my work (the mail server will not
>> accept my relays.)
So far I haven't even seen a subscrip
On 6/26/06, Hugh Lampert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for responding! Perhaps you can forward this to the mailing
> list, as I am unable to reach it from my work (the mail server will not
> accept my relays.)
Done. I'll answer your message without removing anything you wrote.
> I looked a
19 matches
Mail list logo
