On 7 Dec 2006, at 18:22, Ashley Pond V wrote:
On Thursday, Dec 7, 2006, at 07:53 US/Pacific, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
i just looked at the tutorial, a lot more clear and to the point than
other libs I have looked at. Think I'm gonna go with it.
I had a little proof of concept Ajax demo up in
On Thursday, Dec 7, 2006, at 07:53 US/Pacific, Daniel McBrearty wrote:
i just looked at the tutorial, a lot more clear and to the point than
other libs I have looked at. Think I'm gonna go with it.
I had a little proof of concept Ajax demo up in about 10 minutes; just
as long as it took to skim
i just looked at the tutorial, a lot more clear and to the point than
other libs I have looked at. Think I'm gonna go with it.
On 12/7/06, John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Ashley Pond V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006, at 21:06 US/Pacific, A.
> Pagaltzis
--- Ashley Pond V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006, at 21:06 US/Pacific, A.
> Pagaltzis wrote:
> > * apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-07 01:35]:
> >> Does anyone have sample code of anything AJAXy
> (don't care
> >> about the library or if it's hand rolled) that
> runs under
On Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006, at 21:06 US/Pacific, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-07 01:35]:
Does anyone have sample code of anything AJAXy (don't care
about the library or if it's hand rolled) that runs under
application/xhtml+xml?
Why do you want to serve that?
Just to
* apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-07 01:35]:
> Does anyone have sample code of anything AJAXy (don't care
> about the library or if it's hand rolled) that runs under
> application/xhtml+xml?
Why do you want to serve that?
> By default Prototype puts out incompatible script tags and
> I know in t