Re: [Catalyst] Re: AJAX under application/xhtml+xml

2006-12-08 Thread Matt S Trout
On 7 Dec 2006, at 18:22, Ashley Pond V wrote: On Thursday, Dec 7, 2006, at 07:53 US/Pacific, Daniel McBrearty wrote: i just looked at the tutorial, a lot more clear and to the point than other libs I have looked at. Think I'm gonna go with it. I had a little proof of concept Ajax demo up in

Re: [Catalyst] Re: AJAX under application/xhtml+xml

2006-12-07 Thread Ashley Pond V
On Thursday, Dec 7, 2006, at 07:53 US/Pacific, Daniel McBrearty wrote: i just looked at the tutorial, a lot more clear and to the point than other libs I have looked at. Think I'm gonna go with it. I had a little proof of concept Ajax demo up in about 10 minutes; just as long as it took to skim

Re: [Catalyst] Re: AJAX under application/xhtml+xml

2006-12-07 Thread Daniel McBrearty
i just looked at the tutorial, a lot more clear and to the point than other libs I have looked at. Think I'm gonna go with it. On 12/7/06, John Napiorkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Ashley Pond V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006, at 21:06 US/Pacific, A. > Pagaltzis

Re: [Catalyst] Re: AJAX under application/xhtml+xml

2006-12-07 Thread John Napiorkowski
--- Ashley Pond V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006, at 21:06 US/Pacific, A. > Pagaltzis wrote: > > * apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-07 01:35]: > >> Does anyone have sample code of anything AJAXy > (don't care > >> about the library or if it's hand rolled) that > runs under

Re: [Catalyst] Re: AJAX under application/xhtml+xml

2006-12-06 Thread Ashley Pond V
On Wednesday, Dec 6, 2006, at 21:06 US/Pacific, A. Pagaltzis wrote: * apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-07 01:35]: Does anyone have sample code of anything AJAXy (don't care about the library or if it's hand rolled) that runs under application/xhtml+xml? Why do you want to serve that? Just to

[Catalyst] Re: AJAX under application/xhtml+xml

2006-12-06 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* apv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-07 01:35]: > Does anyone have sample code of anything AJAXy (don't care > about the library or if it's hand rolled) that runs under > application/xhtml+xml? Why do you want to serve that? > By default Prototype puts out incompatible script tags and > I know in t