On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:55:45PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> > Sounds sane. Sounds like I have some thinking/work to do for 0.0.3. :)
>
> Sorry :)
No problem, I kinda hacked it together without knowing better. Know I
know there's a better/preferred way, I can improve it - that's what
open-sour
Chisel Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:08:42PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
>> Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper is ... err ... not sanely architected. It stuffs
>> the
>> Catalyst::Log namespace with an extra method, which (a) is a global change
>> that could stomp on other code in the same pro
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:08:42PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper is ... err ... not sanely architected. It stuffs the
> Catalyst::Log namespace with an extra method, which (a) is a global change
> that could stomp on other code in the same process, and (b) will completely
Chisel Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote:
>> Thanks for the answer. Someone know if Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper will
>> switch to Data::Dump as well (or maybe accept patch for that)?
>
> Well you could email the author directly, or hope he stumbles a
Chisel Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote:
>> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too.
>
> I was thinking about this a little last night.
>
> How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core
> I believe) and adding a new
On 06/07/06, Chisel Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote:> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too.I was thinking about this a little last night.How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core
I believe) a
Chisel Wright ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote:
>> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too.
>
> I was thinking about this a little last night.
>
> How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core
> I believe) and adding
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote:
> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too.
I was thinking about this a little last night.
How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core
I believe) and adding a new method dump() - which is in keepi
Chisel Wright ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote:
>> Thanks for the answer. Someone know if Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper will
>> switch to Data::Dump as well (or maybe accept patch for that)?
>
> Well you could email the author directly, or hope he stumb
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote:
> Thanks for the answer. Someone know if Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper will
> switch to Data::Dump as well (or maybe accept patch for that)?
Well you could email the author directly, or hope he stumbles across it
here ;-)
I'll look
Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
>> Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
>>> What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead?
>>
>> erm I mean "... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump"
>
> Specifically designed for debugging
>
> More r
Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
> Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
>> What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead?
>
> erm I mean "... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump"
Specifically designed for debugging
More readable output
Doesn't have stupid bugs that leave th
Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
> What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead?
erm I mean "... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump"
eloy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej
_
What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead?
eloy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman
14 matches
Mail list logo