Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Chisel Wright
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:55:45PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > > Sounds sane. Sounds like I have some thinking/work to do for 0.0.3. :) > > Sorry :) No problem, I kinda hacked it together without knowing better. Know I know there's a better/preferred way, I can improve it - that's what open-sour

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Matt S Trout
Chisel Wright wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:08:42PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: >> Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper is ... err ... not sanely architected. It stuffs >> the >> Catalyst::Log namespace with an extra method, which (a) is a global change >> that could stomp on other code in the same pro

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Chisel Wright
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:08:42PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper is ... err ... not sanely architected. It stuffs the > Catalyst::Log namespace with an extra method, which (a) is a global change > that could stomp on other code in the same process, and (b) will completely

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Matt S Trout
Chisel Wright wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote: >> Thanks for the answer. Someone know if Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper will >> switch to Data::Dump as well (or maybe accept patch for that)? > > Well you could email the author directly, or hope he stumbles a

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Matt S Trout
Chisel Wright wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote: >> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too. > > I was thinking about this a little last night. > > How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core > I believe) and adding a new

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Kieren Diment
On 06/07/06, Chisel Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote:> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too.I was thinking about this a little last night.How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core I believe) a

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Marcello Romani
Chisel Wright ha scritto: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote: >> FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too. > > I was thinking about this a little last night. > > How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core > I believe) and adding

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Chisel Wright
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Marcello Romani wrote: > FWIW, I prefer Data::Dump over Data::Dumper, too. I was thinking about this a little last night. How about leaving the dumper() method as-is (since Data::Dumper is core I believe) and adding a new method dump() - which is in keepi

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-06 Thread Marcello Romani
Chisel Wright ha scritto: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote: >> Thanks for the answer. Someone know if Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper will >> switch to Data::Dump as well (or maybe accept patch for that)? > > Well you could email the author directly, or hope he stumb

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-05 Thread Chisel Wright
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:05PM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyżaniak wrote: > Thanks for the answer. Someone know if Catalyst::Plugin::Dumper will > switch to Data::Dump as well (or maybe accept patch for that)? Well you could email the author directly, or hope he stumbles across it here ;-) I'll look

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-05 Thread Krzysztof Krzyżaniak
Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: >> Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: >>> What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead? >> >> erm I mean "... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump" > > Specifically designed for debugging > > More r

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-05 Thread Matt S Trout
Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: > Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: >> What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead? > > erm I mean "... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump" Specifically designed for debugging More readable output Doesn't have stupid bugs that leave th

Re: [Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-05 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak
Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote: > What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead? erm I mean "... for droppig Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump" eloy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej _

[Catalyst] data::dump vs data::dumper

2006-07-05 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak
What is the reason for using Data::Dumper and using Data::Dump instead? eloy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman