[Catalyst] Legacy porting to auto-authenticate a logged in user

2007-12-22 Thread Ashley Pond V
I have what I first thought was a gimme (this is only tangentially related to the questions I asked a few days ago; same app, different DB and part). Legacy porting of a "login" with Authenticate where I already have the user id and everything verified. I have tried many permutations of arg

[Catalyst] Re: javascript in Catalyst using Template Toolkit

2007-12-22 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-22 00:30]: > on the other hand, if you are running your app on a server that you > own and do admin for, and don't have such admin problems to negotiate, > it would be fine, eh? horses for courses and all that. Is it appreciably less work to omit the

RE: [Catalyst] Legacy porting to auto-authenticate a logged in user

2007-12-22 Thread Peter Edwards
Try $c->authenticate({ acctid => $user->username, password => $user->password }) or die "RC_403: " . $user->username . " failed to authenticate"; Regards, Peter -Original Message- From: Ashley Pond V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 December 2007 08

[Catalyst] Re: javascript in Catalyst using Template Toolkit

2007-12-22 Thread kevin montuori
> "AP" == A Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AP> * Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-22 00:30]: >> on the other hand, if you are running your app on a server that you >> own and do admin for, and don't have such admin problems to negotiate, >> it would be fine, eh? horses

Re: [Catalyst] Re: javascript in Catalyst using Template Toolkit

2007-12-22 Thread Kieren Diment
On 23 Dec 2007, at 01:06, kevin montuori wrote: obCatalyst: let me add that if you use emacs :| you could define a little function like: (defun ii-insert-catalyst-url () (interactive) (let ((path (read-from-minibuffer "URI: "))) (insert (format "a>" path)) (backward-

[Catalyst] Re: javascript in Catalyst using Template Toolkit

2007-12-22 Thread kevin montuori
> "KD" == Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KD> On 23 Dec 2007, at 01:06, kevin montuori wrote: >> (add-hook 'html-mode-hook KD> well tt-mode would be more sensible. my mileage varied. the font-locking of TT keywords would be ok but the the completion, indention, and validation

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] ASP.NET MVC#

2007-12-22 Thread Zbigniew Lukasiak
On Dec 21, 2007 10:22 PM, Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm not completely following the new syntax that you are proposing, so > please forgive if I am wide of the mark here ... but ... > > IMO the existing syntax is really not *that* bad - the only mild crit > I have is that Args()