On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Robert Krimen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Ian Tegebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW, it appears Catalyst::View::Jemplate broke after Jemplate >= 0.21
>> changed the behaviour of Jemplate::runtime_source_code (see RT 35
Hello, there, Zbigniew,
Thanks for the article, "Perl Alchemy - notes of a Catalyst programmer".
Phew.. Thought I was going insane cause I figured a proper ORM would not
have this problem.
Anyway, can you please give some examples of using pk => undef?
The code extract below is what I used
On 18 Aug 2008, at 22:00, James S. White wrote:
[snip]
Using CPAN to manage your systems when you have a handful of boxes
is fine, and
if you're doing development, I'd recommend it as well. But when you
have over
200, having multiple versions of perl and CPAN modules all over the
system
* James S. White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-18 23:10]:
> Using CPAN to manage your systems when you have a handful of
> boxes is fine, and if you're doing development, I'd recommend
> it as well. But when you have over 200, having multiple
> versions of perl and CPAN modules all over the system b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I'd like to announce a new Cat application which is now on the CPAN.
The ListFramework Builder (LFB) takes your DBIx::Class Schema
definition and produces an AJAX CRUD web interface, on the fly. The
specific goals are minimal configuration
I've already gone through this procedure:
My notes are here:
http://github.com/fapestniegd/wcyd/tree/master/scratch/procedures/el5/installing_catalyst_on_el5
There are a lot of them (~137), Matt an I disagree on the using of CPAN
instead of real packages. I say "real" packages, because package m
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 10:48 +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:47:25PM -0500, Andrew Kornak wrote:
> > http://www.webmin.com/usermin.html
> >
> > Not Cat based but is a fairly complete perl-based, modular, extensible
> > solution as well as a useful system administration tool.
* Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-18 12:00]:
> Leave the system perl on there for system-provided things that
> depend on perl.
>
> Build your own applications perl for your applications.
>
> You are allowed more than one perl on a system. I've got over a
> dozen on the Shadowcat dev se
* Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-17 21:15]:
> I'm going to assume you mean DBIx::Class but if you want to
> abbreviate that please use 'DBIC' - it's really unfair to the
> authors of other DBIx:: modules otherwise (compare to people
> saying "Linux 9" when they actually mean "Red Hat Lin
* On Sun, Aug 17 2008, Matt S Trout wrote:
> That makes no sense.
>
> How does restarting other processes have any effect at all?
Locking?
Not that I've ever seen this for sessions or cache, but it could make
sense if the app is doing its own locking of some shared resource.
Regards,
Jonathan Ro
2008/8/18 Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I agree it is a great tool - shame the mailing list is down.
The FormFu list uses the same server as this catalyst list - so it's
probably not down ;)
The old rawmode.org address has been killed though.
I think all the documentation has been updated, but
2008/8/18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> hello there
> I love using HTML::FormFu in these two aspects:
> 1) Validation - oh ,yeah :)
> 2) configuration (via yaml in my case)
>
>
> nevertheless, is there any way we can control the rendering (in TT2)?
> From what has been done in the catalyst tute for
Hmm,
Maybe this: http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/2008/06/dbixclass-gotchas.html
- would be a better intro into the subject.
Z.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> hello, all,
>>
>> I a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> hello there
>I love using HTML::FormFu in these two aspects:
> 1) Validation - oh ,yeah :)
> 2) configuration (via yaml in my case)
>
>
> nevertheless, is there any way we can control the rendering (in TT2)?
> From what has been done in the catalyst tute for html:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello, all,
>
> I am trying to use DBIx::Class method, "update_or_create_related" to
> cut down the amount of code I have. My code has happily worked with
>
> 1) me manually doing a search (with "find") to see if an object in
> quest
perhaps i have the same problem. I already send a patch to the IRC with
a test-case.
Can you write a short test too?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
hello, all,
I am trying to use DBIx::Class method, "update_or_create_related" to
cut down the amount of code I have. My code has happily worked wit
2008/8/18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> hello there
> I love using HTML::FormFu in these two aspects:
> 1) Validation - oh ,yeah :)
> 2) configuration (via yaml in my case)
>
>
> nevertheless, is there any way we can control the rendering (in TT2)?
> From what has been done in the catalyst tute for
hello there
I love using HTML::FormFu in these two aspects:
1) Validation - oh ,yeah :)
2) configuration (via yaml in my case)
nevertheless, is there any way we can control the rendering (in TT2)?
From what has been done in the catalyst tute for html::FormFu, i
noticed that it just lists do
hello, all,
I am trying to use DBIx::Class method, "update_or_create_related" to
cut down the amount of code I have. My code has happily worked with
1) me manually doing a search (with "find") to see if an object in
question exists or not. If it doesn't, I will issue a "new"/"create" .
Else, th
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 11:32:03AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> 1) Since Catalyst::Plugin::FormValidator is considered a "thin" wrapper
> around Data::FormValidator, shouldn't we be keeping the naming
> conventions the same?
Somebody needs to write Catalyst::Controller::FormVal
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 08:26:25PM +0100, Dermot wrote:
> > But right now, the only thing RHEL/CentOS perl builds are good for is making
> > consultants like us billable hours fixing all the stupid problems and/or
> > moving the client's platform to something else.
>
>
> Hardware manufacturer's o
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:28:57PM +0800, Martin Ellison wrote:
> I am resubmitting this patch *again*, could someone please look at it.
You only submitted it once, halfway down a thread on the users' list.
Once it's on -dev and fits the changes I've proposed I'll be able to chase
the maintainer
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:43:07PM +0100, Dermot wrote:
> Building your own Perl is challenging too. On those disto you will be
> asked to force remove it and it's dependencies. It has the potential
> to break your OS and will certainly compromise your package manager.
No, you won't.
Leave the sy
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:37:11PM +0800, Martin Ellison wrote:
> 2008/8/18 Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ...config should be under 'Plugin::PageCache' as I said - that's the
> > standard for plugin config info.
> >
> > If PageCache is still using old style it'd be nice if you could do a
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 05:47:25PM -0500, Andrew Kornak wrote:
> http://www.webmin.com/usermin.html
>
> Not Cat based but is a fairly complete perl-based, modular, extensible
> solution as well as a useful system administration tool. I have used
> Webmin and Usermin for many years and highly recom
25 matches
Mail list logo
