Re: [Catalyst] New version of InstantCRUD

2009-02-21 Thread Oliver Gorwits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Zbigniew, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > In short I am open for collaboration - but I found it difficult > to express my expectations for the library without writing my own > code. I (author of the ListFramework Builder CRUD - LFB) couldn't agree mor

Re: [Catalyst] New version of InstantCRUD

2009-02-21 Thread Zbigniew Lukasiak
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Oliver Gorwits wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Zbigniew, > > Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: >> In short I am open for collaboration - but I found it difficult >> to express my expectations for the library without writing my own >> code.

Re: [Catalyst] windows install issues (Was: RFC: New to Catalystquestions)

2009-02-21 Thread Octavian Râsnita
From: Rodrigo > Oops, ok, sorry, I thought you had Strawberry. Last year I swapped all things "Active" for Strawberry Perl. > > In any case, maybe you can tinker with the ActivePerl cpan Config.pm so that it uses the MinGW compiler and the Strawberry cpan settings. The > idea would be

Re: [Catalyst] windows install issues (Was: RFC: New to Catalystquestions)

2009-02-21 Thread Rodrigo
> I've tried to use Strawberry Perl, but I've seen that I can't install some > modules on it. > > I needed to install MIME::Tools by downloading the package manually, and > doing perl Makefile.PL, dmake, skip dmake test and do only dmake install, > because I couldn't do it using cpan. On the dmake

Re: [Catalyst] New version of InstantCRUD

2009-02-21 Thread Oliver Gorwits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > Have you thought about a REST-like inteface? Yes, definitely going to use some kind of published API, probably REST-like. That way the javascript heavy frontend could be swapped out for a (possibly less feature rich) HTML

[Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread Octavian Râşniţă
Hello, It is very clear that a Catalyst app can't run on a shared host, but it requires either a dedicated server or a VPS. I am searching for web space providers that offer VPS and I've seen that they use to set their tariff plans mainly on the guaranteed memory, but I don't know which would

Re: [Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Octavian Râşniţă wrote: > Hello, > > It is very clear that a Catalyst app can't run on a shared host, but > it requires either a dedicated server or a VPS. > I am searching for web space providers that offer VPS and I've seen > that they use to set their tariff plans mainly o

Re: [Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread Ashley
On Feb 21, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Octavian Râşniţă wrote: It is very clear that a Catalyst app can't run on a shared host, but it requires either a dedicated server or a VPS. I've been running four or five Cat apps on shared hosting for 3 years. I wouldn't do it for a business but it's fine for r

Re: [Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread Andrew Rodland
On Saturday 21 February 2009 05:04:54 pm Jonathan Rockway wrote: > * On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Octavian Râşniţă wrote: > > Hello, > > > > It is very clear that a Catalyst app can't run on a shared host, but > > it requires either a dedicated server or a VPS. > > I am searching for web space providers th

[Catalyst] Maybe there is a need for some speedups of 'config' method ?

2009-02-21 Thread Oleg Pronin
Hello. Catalyst is the best MVC ever. Thanks for doing your work guys! I use Catalyst in extremely loaded projects (currently 60.000.000 pageloads / day). Thereforce i'm perfomance paranoid man. One of 'black stones' is the ->config method. It has dramatically slow perfomance at config_method: 1

Re: [Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread Ashley
On Feb 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: We run lots of Catalyst apps on the smallest Linode. I think they give us something like 340M of RAM. This is enough. I use a 512M Slicehost for jrock.us, which runs my mail server and a few Catalyst applications I know this is getti

Re: [Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Ashley wrote: > On Feb 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: >> We run lots of Catalyst apps on the smallest Linode. I think they >> give >> us something like 340M of RAM. This is enough. >> >> I use a 512M Slicehost for jrock.us, which runs my mail server and a >>

Re: [Catalyst] Requirements for Catalyst

2009-02-21 Thread bill hauck
--- On Sun, 2/22/09, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > Slicehost does have one killer feature that Lindoe > doesn't -- nightly, > weekly, and on-demand full-system backups. This saved my > life when I > upgraded Debian Stable last weekend and it went horribly > wrong due to > the crappy version of Xen

Re: [Catalyst] Maybe there is a need for some speedups of 'config' method ?

2009-02-21 Thread Jonathan Rockway
* On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Oleg Pronin wrote: > I use Catalyst in extremely loaded projects (currently 60.000.000 pageloads / > day). > Thereforce i'm perfomance paranoid man. > > One of 'black stones' is the ->config method. It has dramatically slow > perfomance at > config_method: 1 wallclock secs