Hi, guys,
I have been trying to create some custom constraints for my form
attributes. I use Catalyst::Plugin::FormValidator
when I call my custom subroutine that handles a custom constraint, I
notice it will not get the attribute value.
I have looked up the docs for
1) Data::FormValidator::
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Lee Aylward wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:24:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Quevillon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am playing with REST and Jemplate from the great Tuts from JRock's
> > book.
> > However, I am facing a problem. I understand well how to retrieve
> > data fr
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:24:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Quevillon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am playing with REST and Jemplate from the great Tuts from JRock's
> book.
> However, I am facing a problem. I understand well how to retrieve
> data from a REST url and playing Ajax with it, by a GET method.
> However
Interesting. I will give it some more thought. Thanks :)
Quoting kevin montuori :
> > "DD" == David Dorward writes:
>
> DD> Limiting the side effects of laziness and bad practices with
> other bad
> DD> practices ... well, that's an interesting argument, I'll give
> you that.
>
> that's
Quoting Octavian Rasnita :
> From:
> > --> So, tell me, would you like to allow people to bookmark
> transaction
> > ID numbers or attributes which are not permanent (ie will last
> until a
> > transaction is done)?
>
> Yes. If the users want to do that, it is very good to let them do it,
> and
Quoting David Dorward :
> kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
> > --> So, tell me, would you like to allow people to bookmark
> transaction
> > ID numbers or attributes which are not permanent (ie will last
> until a
> > transaction is done)?
> >
> Why would a user try to bookmark such a page? It doesn'
> "DD" == David Dorward writes:
DD> Limiting the side effects of laziness and bad practices with other bad
DD> practices ... well, that's an interesting argument, I'll give you that.
that's funny.
all other things being equal, since catalyst controllers can be method
agnostic there's no r
From:
--> So, tell me, would you like to allow people to bookmark transaction
ID numbers or attributes which are not permanent (ie will last until a
transaction is done)?
Yes. If the users want to do that, it is very good to let them do it, and
the next time when they'll come, they will see t
kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
--> So, tell me, would you like to allow people to bookmark transaction
ID numbers or attributes which are not permanent (ie will last until a
transaction is done)?
Why would a user try to bookmark such a page? It doesn't make sense.
What harm would it do if they d
fromDavid Dorward
kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Read my response. I said
1) POST is the prefered method
Not according to the standard. Everything has its place.
--> True . That's why I used the word, "prefered" and not "compulsory" LOL
2) using GET for a content sensitive
kakim...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Read my response. I said
1) POST is the prefered method
Not according to the standard. Everything has its place.
2) using GET for a content sensitive site like an online banking site is
bad. I m sure you would not want to have people book marking your
session ID
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:
> Gesendet: 01.04.09 13:05:29
> An: The elegant MVC web framework
> Betreff: Re: [Catalyst] How to detect if the current form request is a post?
Just for those who are interested:
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet.html#checklist
Best regards
Read my response. I said
1) POST is the prefered method
2) using GET for a content sensitive site like an online banking site is
bad. I m sure you would not want to have people book marking your
session ID , or worst, the user credentials used to login and access
certain pages which are private t
From:
huh?
I woudlnt' use GET unless it's for something very simple such as a REST
request or a way to learn CGI.
I certainly dont want people book marking a url with parameters
So you say that what Google does is something not recommended and that they
should use the POST method?
Octavia
huh?
I woudlnt' use GET unless it's for something very simple such as a REST
request or a way to learn CGI.
I certainly dont want people book marking a url with parameters
especially if i ran a banking transaction website.
Quoting Octavian Rasnita :
> From:
> > Thank you:)
> > Yep, and I a
From:
Thank you:)
Yep, and I am aware of GET as a form request method and yes, i hate it.
Why? I knew that it should be the prefered method for the forms that don't
change anything on the server, like a search form. Isn't this true?
I ask this because I've seen many search forms that use PO
16 matches
Mail list logo
