Thanks for that. (Toby Corkindale too)
I'll do more research and update you later.
Thanks.
Andrew Rodland wrote:
On Monday 28 September 2009 12:56:36 am Fayland Lam wrote:
I'm wondering if someone here did a benchmark between Catalyst 5.7 and 5.8
Benchmark, as requested. View this message a
Toby Corkindale wrote:
It's interesting to note the headline figures have 5.71 performing 316
tps, vs 5.80 making only 283 tps.
Memory usage (for this small app) has increased by 4MB, but is
presumably shared. I guess I should look into that more.
Here are some new analysis of memory usage on
On Monday 28 September 2009 12:56:36 am Fayland Lam wrote:
> I'm wondering if someone here did a benchmark between Catalyst 5.7 and 5.8
Benchmark, as requested. View this message at http://p3m.org/pfn/3499 if your
mailer is too high-tech for fixed-width text.
The Setup:
Linux 2.6 OpenVZ, on Qu
On Monday 28 September 2009 09:31:13 pm Fayland Lam wrote:
> Toby Corkindale wrote:
> > Fayland, I was looking at the benchmarks that you linked, and was just
> > wondering which version of Perl you're running against?
> >
> > (CentOS 5 was one of the operating systems that came with the
> > badly-
Fayland Lam wrote:
I'm wondering if someone here did a benchmark between Catalyst 5.7 and 5.8
I have a vested interest in knowing the difference between the two
versions as well, so knocked up a "proper" test.
I have two identical virtual machines, only on one I installed
Catalyst::Runtime 5.
Toby Corkindale wrote:
(Apologies for top-posting.. have momentarily lost the option to change quoting
styles it seems..)
Fayland, I was looking at the benchmarks that you linked, and was just
wondering which version of Perl you're running against?
(CentOS 5 was one of the operating systems t
Tomas Doran wrote:
Fayland Lam wrote:
from the top, each httpd takes 20M more RAM in 5.8 compared with 5.7
No, that'll be 20Mb of RAM _in total_, as all of those pages should be
shared between your apache processes (given that you're preloading your
application in the parent process).
top
Ok. I have verified it's the encoding function's problem, or at least
the encoding problem is in the server, not JQuery or JS.
I dumped the $output just before returning and the output is all
scrambled. My shell and complete locale in Debian is UTF-8 so the
problem seems effectively to be the enco
I have sent you an example directly to your mail. If anyone else wants
to test, let me know and I will forward to you as well.
Thanks,
Alejandro Imass
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Tomas Doran wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>> Well, that's it for now, but I can verify that by using to_js
Sure, I can work out an example but I'm up to my neck in work so it
won't be immediate...
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Tomas Doran wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>> Well, that's it for now, but I can verify that by using to_json it
>> actually solves my encoding problems.
>
> Well, I hav
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Well, that's it for now, but I can verify that by using to_json it
actually solves my encoding problems.
Well, I have this working fine for me in my environment, but I'm
prepared to believe it may not work for you, as we do fairly wacky
things with uft8 (for hysterical
Hi,
The current version (0.77) seems to be encoding JSON with UTF-8 data
wrong. In fact. I have noticed this problem since earlier versions,
and it's still present in 0.77. I think that with JSON v2 many things
changed and using encode_json is actually re-encoding the data, if the
data is already
Sorry to interrupt, but that is a !!WOW!!
I used CentOS a few weeks ago and i have to say that it could be better if
it was updated... But seems that they are with internal problems ...
2009/9/28 Stuart Watt
> Toby Corkindale wrote:
>
> (CentOS 5 was one of the operating systems that came with
Toby Corkindale wrote:
(CentOS 5 was one of the operating systems that came with the badly-patched
Perl with the slow bless performance..
although I'm sure it's been patched by now?
ie. http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
)
This issue is still listed as open for Cento
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Jens Schwarz wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I followed the Catalyst Tutorial at [1] and created the wrapper template.
> Everything works fine except that I have a few selected actions in my
> Controllers that should explicit NOT use this template.
>
> Any hints on how to acco
(Apologies for top-posting.. have momentarily lost the option to change quoting
styles it seems..)
Fayland, I was looking at the benchmarks that you linked, and was just
wondering which version of Perl you're running against?
(CentOS 5 was one of the operating systems that came with the badly-p
Fayland Lam wrote:
from the top, each httpd takes 20M more RAM in 5.8 compared with 5.7
No, that'll be 20Mb of RAM _in total_, as all of those pages should be
shared between your apache processes (given that you're preloading your
application in the parent process).
top totally doesn't show
17 matches
Mail list logo
