[Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread Amit Jha
Does anyone have any advice on what will the best option mod_perl or FastCGI or something else. if I have the following development/production environment for my web application which is a search engine. 1. Linux(RHEL5) 2. Apache 2.2.x 3. Perl 5.10 4. mod_perl 2.0.x 5. mysql 5.1.x 6. Catalyst

Re: [Catalyst] mod_fcgid on win32

2010-01-29 Thread Alexander Hartmaier
Is it still valid? Copyright (c) 1995-1996 Open Market, Inc. -- Best regards, Alex Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 15:45 +0100 schrieb Hans Dieter Pearcey: Excerpts from Alexander Hartmaier's message of Thu Jan 28 09:29:42 -0500 2010: I've looked *multiple* times for it, but not in the

Re: [Catalyst] mod_fcgid on win32

2010-01-29 Thread kmx
Hi, Ok, so I may be getting somewhere with this, but I can't tell. I installed the .dll found here: http://www.fastcgi.com/dist/ and now my config looks like the following: ... Any ideas on what I might try next? Have you tried the mod_fastcgi binaries and config example described on

Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread Adam Mackler
Well, I'm sure no expert, but that doesn't stop me from having opinions. The reasons I stopped using mod_perl are: safer when perl encounters errors, easier for learning, easier for development, better error messages when restarting production applications, and the ability to have each

Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread xenoterrac...@gmail.com
Enlightening how do you feel about fastcgi vs psgi? ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site:

Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread Hans Dieter Pearcey
Excerpts from xenoterrac...@gmail.com's message of Fri Jan 29 20:22:48 -0500 2010: Enlightening how do you feel about fastcgi vs psgi? This question makes no sense. How do you feel about HTML vs. HTTP? PSGI is an interface for Perl code. FastCGI is an interface for network communications.

Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread Bill Moseley
Just so it's not one-sided, I moved from FastCGI to mod_perl some years back. Start up and restart time was one issue, IIRC, but mod_perl was trivial to configure and solved stability issues we were seeing. I never went back, so maybe it's better now. Is there now a manager that will spawn more

Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread xenoterrac...@gmail.com
Hmm. Perhaps i misunderstand the concept. I was thinking there was the third option of using a psgi server or mod psgi -Original Message- Date: Friday, January 29, 2010 8:50:07 pm To: catalyst catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk From: Hans Dieter Pearcey hdp.perl.catalyst.us...@weftsoar.net

Re: [Catalyst] Using Catalyst with mod_per or FastCGI on heavy traffic web application

2010-01-29 Thread Adam Mackler
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:14:09PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote: I don't really see how what server you use effects error messages. Stderr is stderr. I would never use the canned Apache error responses anyway for a site. -- Bill Moseley Oops, I see did not explain that point clearly. By