Andrew Rodland and...@cleverdomain.org writes:
On Thursday 08 April 2010 08:12:24 pm Toby Corkindale wrote:
On 08/04/10 22:49, Daniel Pittman wrote:
...but your lost database *also* exposed user account/password pairs,
which can now be tried against other services, since people usually use
Hi,
Can any body help me on finding out a best way:
I am planning to build an application on catalyst. I have 3 different module
1. Admin Utility.
2. Search Utility.
3. Index List Utility.
All modules have lots of jobs to perform.
My question is to create a separate catalyst app for each and
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Toby Corkindale
toby.corkind...@strategicdata.com.au wrote:
We package things up into Debian-style packages, and then upload those to a
local repository of packages.
Then servers can just be updated using the standard system tools (apt).
Hi Toby,
This is
On 9 Apr 2010, at 02:58, Evan Carroll wrote:
I already patched this with a fix, it is on github and I've linked to
it and posted it on rt. Janus told me he would give me maintenance to
post it on CPAN, and he hasn't followed through yet. It fixes the
problem by permitting you to pull in a
As far as I can tell, the whole point of this patch is aimed at the 'hashed'
password case only (rather than 'salted_hash').
The vulnerability was never against salted_hash. I've since learned
what Crypt::SaltedHash is I just don't believe I have a reason to use
it. Why would I want to use
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 9 Apr 2010, at 03:05, Evan Carroll wrote:
http://github.com/EvanCarroll/Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication
Anyway, that's the repo -- Find the commits here:
This is actually a very unhelpful way to supply patches, as it makes the
maintainer have to do a whole chunk of work to get as your patch. As such,
given limited time, I haven't looked..
Here is the patch range for review:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Evan Carroll li...@evancarroll.com wrote:
Without any unnecessary commentary, here is the implementation of the
password_(pre|post)_salt_field, without other features that should be
patched separately.
http://codepeek.com/paste/4bbf456c0ae3049443a742a2
I
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Toby Corkindale
toby.corkind...@strategicdata.com.au wrote:
We package things up into Debian-style packages, and then upload those to
a local repository of packages.
Then servers can just
Bogdan Lucaciu wrote on 4/9/10 2:10 PM:
To properly include the templates I would just use something like:
View::TT
INCLUDE_PATH = __path_to(root)__
...
or similar.
The static content lives in /usr/share/perl5/Dist/Name/root/static, if
you use a caching reverse proxy (like
10 matches
Mail list logo
