Re: [Catalyst] Re: Alternatives to Catalyst ?

On 23/04/10 09:10, Lyle wrote: Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: You should switch to PHP. PHP is pronounced "poop", and there is far too much poop on the web already. There's also too much noise and not enough signal on the mailing list. Can we all try and resist cheap shots, name-calling, me-too

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Alternatives to Catalyst ?

Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: * Oleg Pronin [2010-04-21 18:40]: Guys, is Catalyst a senior system ? I think that creator of Moose, and some similar shit is in cooperation with hardware manufactorers :-) The more CPU spent - the more hardware bought. You should switch to PHP. Maybe

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Alternatives to Catalyst ?

Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: You should switch to PHP. PHP is pronounced "poop", and there is far too much poop on the web already. Lyle ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Sea

[Catalyst] Re: Alternatives to Catalyst ?

* Oleg Pronin [2010-04-21 18:40]: > Guys, is Catalyst a senior system ? > > I think that creator of Moose, and some similar shit is in > cooperation with hardware manufactorers :-) > The more CPU spent - the more hardware bought. You should switch to PHP. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: [Catalyst] Alternatives to Catalyst ?

On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:27 PM, "Larry Leszczynski" wrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:30 +0400, "Oleg Pronin" wrote: 1) Getting all params 3x faster than only one 2) Getting $req->{parameters}{lang} 150x faster than $req->param ('lang') What a surprise: accessing the hash directly is fast