* Bernhard Bauch [2015-07-08 16:50]:
> suroundings: catalyst, psgi, starman, apache2.
> but in our setup there are *two* apache2s doing reverse proxies before
> the requests reaches the starman server.
>
> so what happend:
>
> the http headers look like this (for catalyst)
> X-FORWARDED-FOR:
Hey guys,
I've been working on a project which is a (mostly) drop in replacement for
Catalyst::Plugin::Session. Here are the GitHub repos:
https://github.com/bluefeet/Web-Starch
https://github.com/bluefeet/Web-Starch-Store-CHI
https://github.com/bluefeet/Web-Starch-Store-AmazonDynamoDB
https://g
sorry.
s =~ /less/ful/
On 08 Jul 2015, at 16:55, Bernhard Bauch wrote:
> Ahh yes, sure i have.
> otherwise $c->uri_for would not produce useless urls.
>
>
> On 08 Jul 2015, at 16:51, Robert Brown wrote:
>
>> Do you have...
>>
>> __PACKAGE__->config(
>> using_frontend_proxy => 1,
>> );
>
Ahh yes, sure i have.
otherwise $c->uri_for would not produce useless urls.
On 08 Jul 2015, at 16:51, Robert Brown wrote:
> Do you have...
>
> __PACKAGE__->config(
> using_frontend_proxy => 1,
> );
>
> ?
>
>
> On 07/08/2015 03:46 PM, Bernhard Bauch wrote:
>> dear all,
>>
>> another dep
Do you have...
__PACKAGE__->config(
using_frontend_proxy => 1,
);
?
On 07/08/2015 03:46 PM, Bernhard Bauch wrote:
dear all,
another deployment question :)
suroundings: catalyst, psgi, starman, apache2.
but in our setup there are *two* apache2s doing reverse proxies before
the requests r
dear all,
another deployment question :)
suroundings: catalyst, psgi, starman, apache2.
but in our setup there are *two* apache2s doing reverse proxies before the
requests reaches the starman server.
so what happend:
the http headers look like this (for catalyst)
X-FORWARDED-FOR: ,
Hey,
As far as I see this controller still works (I didn't even know about it...)
It seems to do something a little different from the built in, which is it
seems to want to return error messages (I can't really tell to be honest). The
built in support will just fail to match, so if you want
Hi Jon,
Does that mean we shouldn't be using :
http://search.cpan.org/~phaylon/Catalyst-Controller-Constraints-0.10_02/lib/Catalyst/Controller/Constraints.pm
Either?
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: John Napiorkowski [mailto:jjn1...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 07 July 2015 19:51
To: The elegant MV
John,
Thank you very much! That was exactly what I needed
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:51:08PM +, John Napiorkowski wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> You can use the Regexp Dispatcher on CPAN, for legacy code. There is no plan
> to stop supporting it, unless we hit a point where we can't support it when
