Re: [Catalyst] Maybe there is a need for some speedups of 'config' method ?

in this case) is passed to the constructor at setup time; all you need to do is make accessors for whatever you want access to: __PACKAGE__-mk_accessors(qw/vip/); sub pay_for_vip : Private { ... my $price = $self-vip-{price}; } -- Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com

Re: [Catalyst] stripping path parts and then redispatch?

/Intro.pod#Built-in_Private_Actions -- Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk

Re: [Catalyst] How to clear off request parameter element

an extra request cycle, but the user's experience will be more correct. -- Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO

Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com wrote: Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: Maybe I am just being lazy now - but before I start digging too deep - did you take into accout that some forms require loading stuff from the DB? It can happen

Re: [Catalyst] RFC: Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO

( app = $c ); so that the form can access model-related stuff as necessary. (This is safe because RHTMLO automatically weakens any value passed to -app). Would something like that address your cases? -- Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com ___ List

Re: [Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RFC: Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO

Jason Gottshall wrote: John Siracusa wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com wrote: Caching sounds wise. The only kink I see is that my controller allows for multiple instances of the same form. The same form meaning what? If you store forms keyed

Re: [Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RFC: Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO

Peter Karman wrote: Jason Gottshall wrote on 1/22/09 4:52 PM: [Cross-posted to catalyst-users and rhtmlo lists] I know there are several modules out there that hook up rhtmlo and catalyst, but none of them do what I want. They all seem to do too much: connect to a CRUD API, interface

Re: [Catalyst] Re: [RHTMLO] RFC: Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO

John Siracusa wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jason Gottshall jgottsh...@capwiz.com wrote: Caching sounds wise. The only kink I see is that my controller allows for multiple instances of the same form. The same form meaning what? If you store forms keyed by an arbitrary name string

[Catalyst] RFC: Catalyst::Controller::RHTMLO

::CRUD::Controller::RHTMLO A component that enables use of Rose::HTML::Form objects with Peter Karman's cool LCatalystX::CRUD API. =back =head1 SEE ALSO LRose::HTML::Form, LRose::HTML::Objects, LRose::Object, LCatalyst::Controller, LCatalyst::Action, LCatalyst =head1 AUTHOR Jason Gottshall

Re: [Catalyst] Example app showing user to item authorization?

, then you just pass $c-user to the schema at the beginning of the request. RestrictWithObject will intercept all searches and tack on the appropriate filter for the requested resultset for you. HTH, Jason -- Jason Gottshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ List

Re: [Catalyst] Catalyst Chained talk at Orlando Perl Oasis - January 17th, 2009

J. Shirley wrote: You can give information on the conference at http://perloasis.org/opw/ Correct conference URL is http://perloasis.org/opw2009/ -- Jason Gottshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http