Re: [Catalyst] on the topic of PAR file distribution, why is it frowned upon?

2010-02-26 Thread Robert Buels
I've actually had pretty good results deploying my web apps with Shipwright. The docs and the code are rough, but it actually works pretty well. It sputters a bit on configure-requires and on some of the stranger cases of dependencies, but sounds like it works better than PAR. Anybody else

Re: [Catalyst] featurizing a catalyst app

2009-06-28 Thread Robert Buels
Rodrigo wrote: But how about the /root part? Can mixed-up root dirs be seen as a single root dir easily? I'm interested in making a pluggable app as well. Seems like you and I would want the ability to specify an arrayref for MyApp-config-{root}, and have that work. Poking around

Re: [Catalyst] catalyst.pl-generated installer installs MyApp/root in same dir as MyApp/lib/*?

2009-06-09 Thread Robert Buels
Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote: This is so strange to me; I *always* install my applications with make install, or make debian packages of them, or... Ditto. For me, the most important aspect of actually doing an installation is having dependencies get pulled in automatically. For example, if

[Catalyst] catalyst.pl-generated installer installs MyApp/root in same dir as MyApp/lib/*?

2009-06-08 Thread Robert Buels
The Module::Install code generated by catalyst.pl puts MyApp/root into blib/lib/MyApp/root, right alongside all the things from MyApp/lib. Is this actually the Right Thing to do? Seems fishy to put the templates and images and such in the same place as the perl modules. In the pod for