On 28 Aug 2009, at 19:05, Bill Moseley wrote:
Well, if you were going to write something like RenderView now would
you still write it as an ActionClass?
Yes, as Render view isn't something I would ever want two of them on
the same action.
As a counter example, Catalyst::ActionRole::ACL
I was starting to implement a custom ActionClass (similar to RenderView) and
then wondered if it would be better written as a Moose role.
Is there a reason to use one over another?
Last I looked, an action is limited to a single ActionClass (although it's
easy to deal with that), but depending on
On 28 Aug 2009, at 18:25, Bill Moseley wrote:
I was starting to implement a custom ActionClass (similar to
RenderView) and then wondered if it would be better written as a
Moose role.
Maybe - depends what you're doing. They're doing different things
really, and I'd need more details to
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 28 Aug 2009, at 18:25, Bill Moseley wrote:
I was starting to implement a custom ActionClass (similar to RenderView)
and then wondered if it would be better written as a Moose role.
Maybe - depends what you're
