[Catalyst] Directory layout

2007-11-08 Thread Gerda Shank
Thanks for the responses to my question about the View Directory. I'm still trying to figure out the reasons for the rest of the directory layout. The templates are not in the View directory, because the "lib" hierarchy is just for Perl code. Is that right? Is "root" kind of the equivalent of

Re: [Catalyst] Directory layout

2007-11-08 Thread Cory Watson
On Nov 8, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Gerda Shank wrote: The templates are not in the View directory, because the "lib" hierarchy is just for Perl code. Is that right? Yes. The Model, Controller and View directories house the respective perl classes that handle those functions. Is "root" kind of

Re: [Catalyst] Directory layout

2007-11-08 Thread Jonas Alves
On 11/8/07, Gerda Shank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the responses to my question about the View Directory. I'm > still trying to figure out the reasons for the rest of the directory layout. > > The templates are not in the View directory, because the "lib" hierarchy > is just for Perl c

Re: [Catalyst] Directory layout

2007-11-08 Thread Kieren Diment
On 9 Nov 2007, at 01:47, Gerda Shank wrote: Thanks for the responses to my question about the View Directory. I'm still trying to figure out the reasons for the rest of the directory layout. The templates are not in the View directory, because the "lib" hierarchy is just for Perl code. Is