On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Tomas Doranbobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
On 22 Jun 2009, at 16:43, Tobias Kremer wrote:
Am I missing something here or do I really have to checkout my app on
a fresh installation with no prerequisites installed and try the above
there?
Yeah, pretty much at the
On 23 Jun 2009, at 08:59, Tobias Kremer wrote:
These things make the local::lib approach a bit more unappealing for
us. For one thing, it appears to be still quite a bit rough around the
edges and I doubt that there's anything I personally could do about it
because my knowledge there is
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Tomas Doranbobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
I think you need a better separation between development and staging. If
you're not running something production like in staging, then IMO you're
really screwed.
Actually, we do :)
Developers can then use what they
On 23 Jun 2009, at 09:41, Tobias Kremer wrote:
Developers can then use what they like (and whatever OS/versions
of modules)
they want, if they want to install the app locally, but that's
unsupported.
I'd also make a 'production like' (i.e. same OS) vmware machine
available
with the
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Tobias Kremer wrote:
Cool, but what I really meant to ask was: Is it possible to require a
specific version in your Makefile.PL and have only this version
installed during make installdeps? :) This would possibly solve most
of the CPAN-related deployment problems.
FWIW,
After reading about local::lib and thinking that it's too good to be
true, I just had to try it out as a possible deployment method for one
of our apps. I have the app and all dependencies running on my
development box. The prerequisites are specified in my app's
Makefile.PL. Now, after having
On 22 Jun 2009, at 16:43, Tobias Kremer wrote:
After reading about local::lib and thinking that it's too good to be
true, I just had to try it out as a possible deployment method for one
of our apps. I have the app and all dependencies running on my
development box. The prerequisites are
