On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 19:40 +0100, Tomas Doran wrote:
On 19 Aug 2009, at 15:35, Matt Koscica wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Eden Cardim edencar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why did you feel that quoting Eden's entire post, including signature
was a good idea? Bottom posting and
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 20:13 +0100, Denny wrote:
Specifically, J. Shirley almost always does this (bottom posting after
quoting entire message _with list sigs too_)
I retract that. Looking at the archives it seems he finally started
trimming the list sigs off the bottom sometime around
On 19 Aug 2009, at 20:13, Denny wrote:
Yes, but. Didn't we have this discussion a few months ago, with zero
result?
Yes, sorry - I should shut the fuck up, and should have just replied
in the manor in which I preferred.
Please lets not have the meta discussion again?
Cheers
t0m
On Aug 19, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Denny wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 20:13 +0100, Denny wrote:
Specifically, J. Shirley almost always does this (bottom posting
after
quoting entire message _with list sigs too_)
I retract that. Looking at the archives it seems he finally started
trimming the
Hello 1990 and silly arguments about quoting and top-posting v bottom-
posting etc. That's not what I joined this list for.
I know that 15-20 years ago it was the LAW that every email list or
Usenet group went through this, but let's move on, eh?
(BTW, top-posting is correct now. Ducks
