Re: [Catalyst] Opinions on static::simple - with caching

2011-02-01 Thread Tomas Doran
On 1 Feb 2011, at 02:17, Toby Corkindale wrote: The case that I find having the headers enabled is as follows: Yep, perfectly reasonable really. I'd like to see it as an option on Static::Simple; I could mod that and send a patch over if you liked? Sure, or just commit into a branch (you

Re: [Catalyst] Opinions on static::simple - with caching

2011-01-31 Thread Tomas Doran
On 31 Jan 2011, at 07:17, Toby Corkindale wrote: snip However, I suppose in situations where that matters, you shouldn't be serving files via Static::Simple.. And the regular Static::Simple still provides Last-Modified headers, which do allow browsers to perform some caching. What do you

Re: [Catalyst] Opinions on static::simple - with caching

2011-01-31 Thread Toby Corkindale
On 31 January 2011 19:04, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote: On 31 Jan 2011, at 07:17, Toby Corkindale wrote: snip However, I suppose in situations where that matters, you shouldn't be serving files via Static::Simple.. And the regular Static::Simple still provides Last-Modified