* Lee Aylward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-03 00:40]:
> Assuming that your shared host has all of the required modules
> installed you can use the .cgi script found in the /scripts
> directory of your catalyst application.
That’s going to be extraordinarily slow.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Anton Katsarov [2009-02-05 17:50]:
> I can also confess that the Internet connection in my town is
> not so good.
If you’re on a modem then 5 seconds might well feel adequate.
The apps I work on load in something like 0.6 +/-0.3 seconds.
If you use an ORM for the model and the DB schema is com
В 11:30 +0200 на 03.10.2008 (пт), Aristotle Pagaltzis написа:
> That’s going to be extraordinarily slow.
Hello this site:
http://www.djmag.bg/
is running on CGI. I think it works fast enough. How do you find it?
Regards.
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scs
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 11:30 +0200 на 03.10.2008 (пт), Aristotle Pagaltzis написа:
>> That's going to be extraordinarily slow.
>
> Hello this site:
>
> http://www.djmag.bg/
>
> is running on CGI. I think it works fast enough. How do you find it?
>
> Regards.
>
В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
> It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
> the first byte.
I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
my .htaccess to serve the static directly from the webserver and now it
loads for 5
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
>
>> It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
>> the first byte.
>
> I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
> my .htaccess to se
2009/2/5 J. Shirley :
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
>> В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
>>
>>> It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
>>> the first byte.
>>
>> I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some c
В 08:30 -0800 на 05.02.2009 (чт), J. Shirley написа:
> If 5 seconds works for you, cool.
>
> Just as a benchmark, all my apps send full HTML in under .8 seconds
> (or I tune them until they do). It's relatively easy to get FCGI
> support and a lot of cheap hosts provide it.
I don't want to argue
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 13:20 -0800 на 04.02.2009 (ср), J. Shirley написа:
>
> > It's hideously slow. It took 16 seconds to load, and most of that was
> > the first byte.
>
> I do agree. But that is because of the statics. I did some changes to
> my .h
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Anton Katsarov wrote:
> В 08:30 -0800 на 05.02.2009 (чт), J. Shirley написа:
>> If 5 seconds works for you, cool.
>>
>> Just as a benchmark, all my apps send full HTML in under .8 seconds
>> (or I tune them until they do). It's relatively easy to get FCGI
>> suppor
10 matches
Mail list logo
