Really good food for thought from everyone. Strangely enough, at
least when I notice, Bill's code is the most like my own of anyone on
the list; in approach and style. I'm less certain than ever, of
course, what I'll end up with but I'm better informed.
Thanks everyone.
On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:37 AM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-05 05:45]:
The Rose form code is very cool. That's what I based my forms
on.
Disclaimer: I haven’t used Form::Processor. However from what
I have seen so far, it seems to solve the *right* problem, with
the right level of abstraction for common things and tweakability
for individual needs, so it currently seems like the most likely
validation framework to work for me.
I don't find automatic form markup creation that useful -- the
forms always seem to need customization.
Template system of choice + HTML::FillInForm works for me and
keeps things reasonably low-effort.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
