On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:31:37PM -0700, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But you're writing a new catalyst app, so you're deploying it under
> > fastcgi,
> > right?
> >
> > Really, mod_perl is a legacy deployment option.
Hi Tatsuhiko!
> I'm assuming what he says is Don't use mod_perl because it's old, and
> use FastCGI instead.
mod_perl isn't really old, as it still enjoys active development (version
2.04 was released just a couple of days ago). So, I presume there are
other arguments against it, even though I do
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://chainsawblues.vox.com/
> > >
> >
> > Your blog is powered by Catalyst running under mod_perl 1.x. Seriously...
> Is'nt it powered by mod_perl talking to a bunch of perlbal backend
> processes?
Yes.
> I'm gues
On 19 Apr 2008, at 06:31, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But you're writing a new catalyst app, so you're deploying it
under fastcgi,
right?
Really, mod_perl is a legacy deployment option. Don't.
...
http://chainsawblue
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But you're writing a new catalyst app, so you're deploying it under fastcgi,
> right?
>
> Really, mod_perl is a legacy deployment option. Don't.
...
> http://chainsawblues.vox.com/
Your blog is powered by Catalyst runn
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Matt S Trout wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> >
> > > My first approach was to do the sending in a cron job - but then came
> > > the requirement that
On Apr 18, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
My first approach was to do the sending in a cron job - but then came
the requirement that the emails should be sent as soon as possible.
Now I have a forking model, but I don't k
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> My first approach was to do the sending in a cron job - but then came
> the requirement that the emails should be sent as soon as possible.
> Now I have a forking model, but I don't know if I implemented it
> correctly (the mod_pe
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>
>
> > In an ideal world, you should be able to dump the messages into your
> > mail system's queue as quickly as you can dump them into a database
> > table (adding to the mail q
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
In an ideal world, you should be able to dump the messages into your
mail system's queue as quickly as you can dump them into a database
table (adding to the mail queue is a disk write, adding to a database is
a disk write, unless you've turned off da
* On Fri, Apr 11 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> I've got a related question - does anyone send bulk emails with that
> plugin? Is the delay reasonable when sending let's say a hundred
> emails or do I need a background mechanism for that? I have now a
> forking solution - but it is a bit comple
Hi,
On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, J. Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Paul Makepeace
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM, J. Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I see there's an Email plugin and wondered if this is eno
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see there's an Email plugin and wondered if this is enough to send
> > email from a form safely & securely or whether something more i
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:51:18PM +0200, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote:
> I've got a related question - does anyone send bulk emails with that
> plugin? Is the delay reasonable when sending let's say a hundred
> emails or do I need a background mechanism for that? I have now a
> forking solution - but
On 04/11/2008 04:42 AM, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> It's terribly easy to get this wrong so wanted some feedback from
> people who'd previously implemented something like this live before
> inadvertently turning my site into a spam conduit :-)
I use the View::Email instead of the Plugin. I find tha
Le Ven 11 avril 2008 12:51, Zbigniew Lukasiak a écrit :
>
> I've got a related question - does anyone send bulk emails with that
> plugin? Is the delay reasonable when sending let's say a hundred
> emails or do I need a background mechanism for that? I have now a
> forking solution - but it is a
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see there's an Email plugin and wondered if this is enough to send
> email from a form safely & securely or whether something more involved
> like a port of NMS CGI exists?
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~mramberg/Cataly
I see there's an Email plugin and wondered if this is enough to send
email from a form safely & securely or whether something more involved
like a port of NMS CGI exists?
http://search.cpan.org/~mramberg/Catalyst-Plugin-Email-0.08/Email.pm
http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/
It's terribly easy to get
19 matches
Mail list logo
