__PACKAGE__-config( actions = { foo = { Path = 'bar' } } );
sub foo {}
This has been introduced in 5.80006. The Catalyst-Manual just didn't
catch up with the changes.
cheers,
moritz
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Bill Moseley mose...@hank.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Eden Cardim edencar...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a specific reason that Private actions may not have additional
attributes?
You can achieve the same effect by using the :Action tag
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Eden Cardimedencar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Bill Moseleymose...@hank.org wrote:
I'm just after a bit more flexibility. Perhaps that limitation could be
based on what dispatch types are available (i.e. don't allow Private with
any
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Eden Cardim edencar...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand your obsession over :Private. A method tagged with
:Action, or any other attribute that doesn't make it use one of the
available dispatch types is effectively *the same thing* as a Private
action,
On 15 Aug 2009, at 19:44, Bill Moseley wrote:
Is there a specific reason that Private actions may not have
additional attributes?
No, there is not.
At the time when that code was written, additional attributes (for
example, those used by Catalyst::Controller::ActionRole) weren't
On 17 Aug 2009, at 09:47, Moritz Onken wrote:
__PACKAGE__-config( actions = { foo = { Path = 'bar' } } );
sub foo {}
This has been introduced in 5.80006. The Catalyst-Manual just didn't
catch up with the changes.
No, it was not.
What gave you that impression?
Am 17.08.2009 um 23:19 schrieb Tomas Doran:
On 17 Aug 2009, at 09:47, Moritz Onken wrote:
__PACKAGE__-config( actions = { foo = { Path = 'bar' } } );
sub foo {}
This has been introduced in 5.80006. The Catalyst-Manual just
didn't catch up with the changes.
No, it was not.
What gave
On 17 Aug 2009, at 22:50, Moritz Onken wrote:
Until then it was necessary to add at least one attribute to the
method.
The calendar uses :Local as attribute.
Aah, yes - my bad, you're totally correct, you needed to
sprinkle :Action around as decoration.. :)
++ Whoever fixed that...
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Eden Cardim edencar...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a specific reason that Private actions may not have additional
attributes?
You can achieve the same effect by using the :Action tag instead, as
mst suggested in reply to the same thread:
Why does Catalyst::Controller not allow additional attributes on Private
actions?
Marcus added this code in r5558 back in November of 2006.
5558 marcus if ( $attrs-{Private} ( keys %$attrs 1 ) ) {
5558 marcus $c-log-debug( 'Bad action definition '
Yes, I
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Bill Moseleymose...@hank.org wrote:
Why does Catalyst::Controller not allow additional attributes on Private
actions?
Marcus added this code in r5558 back in November of 2006.
5558 marcus if ( $attrs-{Private} ( keys %$attrs 1 ) ) {
5558
In Catalyst::Controller register_actions() there's this code:
my $attrs = $self-_parse_attrs( $c, $method, @{ $cache-[1] } );
if ( $attrs-{Private} ( keys %$attrs 1 ) ) {
$c-log-debug( 'Bad action definition '
. join( ' ', @{ $cache-[1] } )
. qq/ for
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 09:29 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
This came up because I'm using SSL to indicate actions that require
SSL:
sub secret : Local SSL {}
But, it would also be handy to be able to protect all actions below
a give controller via:
sub auto : Private SSL { 1 }
Bill Moseley wrote:
In Catalyst::Controller register_actions() there's this code:
my $attrs = $self-_parse_attrs( $c, $method, @{ $cache-[1] } );
if ( $attrs-{Private} ( keys %$attrs 1 ) ) {
$c-log-debug( 'Bad action definition '
. join( ' ', @{ $cache-[1] } )
14 matches
Mail list logo
