Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> * On Monday 05 November 2007 08:50:03 am Matt Lawrence wrote:
>
>>> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>>>
How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>> The interface is different, Module::Mask has a slightly more flexible OO
>> interface, but it doe
* On Monday 05 November 2007 08:50:03 am Matt Lawrence wrote:
> > Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> >> How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>
> The interface is different, Module::Mask has a slightly more flexible OO
> interface, but it does have some limitations that Devel::Hide doesn't.
> Plus
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>
>> Matt Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> I should probably point out that I'm the Module::Mask author, just in
>>> the interests of full disclosure ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>>
The interface is
"Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/02/2007 09:39:31
AM:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> > Matt Lawrence wrote:
> >> I should probably point out that I'm the Module::Mask author, just in
> >> the interests of full disclosure ;-)
> >>
> >
> > How is Module::Mask different from Devel:
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> Matt Lawrence wrote:
>> I should probably point out that I'm the Module::Mask author, just in
>> the interests of full disclosure ;-)
>>
>
> How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
>
> Regards,
> Jonathan Rockway
Or Test::Without::Module?
--
Let them eat c
Matt Lawrence wrote:
> I should probably point out that I'm the Module::Mask author, just in
> the interests of full disclosure ;-)
>
How is Module::Mask different from Devel::Hide?
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Joe Landman wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> Working on deploying a Catalyst app on a customers machine.
> Installation is going well ... until the Catalyst modules that depend
> upon WWW::Mechanize and family come up.
>
> As far as we can tell, the breakage is not the modules, but the
> WWW::Mechanize (
Hi folks:
Working on deploying a Catalyst app on a customers machine.
Installation is going well ... until the Catalyst modules that depend
upon WWW::Mechanize and family come up.
As far as we can tell, the breakage is not the modules, but the
WWW::Mechanize (and therefore, by extension,
