Re: [Catalyst] soliciting feedback for alternative method attributes syntax

2016-01-12 Thread John Napiorkowski
On Monday, January 11, 2016 7:30 AM, Hartmaier Alexander wrote: Hi John, the first question that came to my mind was: Why is it called At, both the module as well as the method attribute? -Thanks for taking the time here, its really helpful!  Obviously I can always write something that mak

Re: [Catalyst] soliciting feedback for alternative method attributes syntax

2016-01-11 Thread Hartmaier Alexander
Hi John, the first question that came to my mind was: Why is it called At, both the module as well as the method attribute? The 'Naming your Arguments' section is confusing because it populates a variable named '$id' but uses '$_{id}' for the response. I understand that you want to show that th

[Catalyst] soliciting feedback for alternative method attributes syntax

2016-01-07 Thread John Napiorkowski
Lots of people tell me the hardest thing about catalyst is the method attributes used to describe routes, particularly chaining.  Here's a sketch for an alternative syntax that encompasses chaining along with more simple routes. jjn1056/Catalyst-ControllerRole-At |   | |   | |   |   |   |   |