Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-18 Thread James S. White
I've already gone through this procedure: My notes are here: http://github.com/fapestniegd/wcyd/tree/master/scratch/procedures/el5/installing_catalyst_on_el5 There are a lot of them (~137), Matt an I disagree on the using of CPAN instead of real packages. I say "real" packages, because package m

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-18 Thread Kieren Diment
On 18 Aug 2008, at 22:00, James S. White wrote: [snip] Using CPAN to manage your systems when you have a handful of boxes is fine, and if you're doing development, I'd recommend it as well. But when you have over 200, having multiple versions of perl and CPAN modules all over the system

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-20 Thread John Lee
Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > Point taken; the usual advice of compiling Perl and running a > vetted CPAN mirror is motivated by the more common situation > where the number of large Perl apps to run, which tend to be > sensitive to module versions and may each require a different > version of the s

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-20 Thread Oliver Gorwits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Lee wrote: | * Upstream providers will sometimes over-package modules, which | can resuilt in conflicts when building new ones. (perl-modules | and libcatalyst-modules-perl Yeah libcatalyst-modules-perl should die a cold, horrible death. | *

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-21 Thread Matt S Trout
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:00:17PM -0500, James S. White wrote: > I've already gone through this procedure: > > My notes are here: > > http://github.com/fapestniegd/wcyd/tree/master/scratch/procedures/el5/installing_catalyst_on_el5 > > There are a lot of them (~137), Matt an I disagree on the us

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-22 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On 18 Aug 2008, at 22:00, James S. White wrote: My notes are here: http://github.com/fapestniegd/wcyd/tree/master/scratch/procedures/el5/installing_catalyst_on_el5 I really hope you aren't just pulling a list of rpms and then installing them. Thats why package handlers like yum were invented

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-22 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On 22 Aug 2008, at 14:44, James S. White wrote: [Regarding number of rpms needed for cat/DBIX] This was just what it took to get the base catalyst going. If your particular App needs other perl modules, that goes in a separate brick. Thinking about it, I always rebuild rpms in a clean environm

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-22 Thread James S. White
> I really hope you aren't just pulling a list of rpms and then installing > them. Thats why package handlers like yum were invented. I'm not. I'm moving them into the yum repos for the servers that get catalyst deployed on them. This "HOWTO" is just how I determine what goes into a given repo. Cf

Re: [Catalyst] Re: list of perl-*.rpm files for a basic Cat install

2008-08-22 Thread Bogdan Lucaciu
On Friday 22 August 2008 16:44:01 James S. White wrote: > > Anyhow I would strongly suggest you look at cpanrpm effort and join that > > campaign - see > >      http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?cpanrpm > >      http://lists.dave.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpanrpm > > Good information. I w