On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:29:55 -0300
Ramiro Polla ramiro.po...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a win32 port almost done. But since it touches *a lot* of code
I'd rather wait for after 3.0 so it can receive more testing.
Nice. Yes, that sounds like a good plan.
-- Joel
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:26:48 +
William S Fulton w...@fultondesigns.co.uk wrote:
I have a semi-fork of ccache for SWIG. See
http://swig.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/swig/trunk/CCache/. It adds support
for the SWIG compiler in addition to C/C++ compilers. The main difference to
a traditional
Hi,
I now don't have any features left on my TODO list for the next ccache release,
which I plan to name 3.0. The main thing left, except more testing and fixing
any bugs that are found, is some work on the documentation, and maybe some
portability stuff.
There are still some features that I
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Joel Rosdahl j...@rosdahl.net wrote:
And does anyone have other feature requests or
semi-forks with features that could be incorporated in later ccache versions?
I have a win32 port almost done. But since it touches *a lot* of code
I'd rather wait for after 3.0
Joel Rosdahl wrote:
Hi,
I now don't have any features left on my TODO list for the next ccache
release,
which I plan to name 3.0. The main thing left, except more testing and
fixing
any bugs that are found, is some work on the documentation, and maybe some
portability stuff.
There are still
