tri...@samba.org wrote:
You are badly misinterpreting that table in HAC.
Yes, you are right. Sorry for the brainfart.
Gunnar
Gunnar,
while reading the implementation notes for ccache, I came to the
question why it uses MD4 and not MD5. MD4 has a significantly
higher collision probability (2^20 instead of 2^64, cf. Menezes/
Oorschot/Vanstone, 'Handbook of Applied Cryptography', p. 339,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 06:25:49PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
The other factor is whether the cache will grow to include a million
files.
We're building a distribution using a build system completely created by us
and it intensively uses ccache. We have approx 1000 packages, including, of
