I seeing something I didn't expect on MY BR2 router.I have two dial-peers
configured to handle local dialing
One to support the 9 prefix and another to allow users to dial anyway if
they forget the 9 prefix.
I'm dialing 93241212
Dial-peer 90 is matching as 9324121 instead of Dial-peer 9 matching.
Basant,
Thank you so much.You pushed me in the right direction and I found the
problem.
I ASSUMED the correct dial-peer was getting hit, but it wasn't.
I had another dial-peer in the config that was only partially configured but
had a better match.
Fixed up the broken dial-peer and it's working.
Hi Scott
I do not much about RAS messages but coming to the basics here, I see the
following in the Gatekeeper Debugs:-
: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#3001) Matched zone prefix 3 and remainder 001
which means GK did found the path for the call correctly using zone prefix
of "3".
Now first thing, we
I'm having a problem getting a call from HQ to BR2 through the GK.
I'm assuming the DCF indicated in the debug RAS means some part of the setup
between UCM and BR2 is not working
but can't pinpoint it.
-
debug gatekeeper main 10 indicates the request is coming from UCM
: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x8
I just tried to load CUC on a new/separate VM on the same host machine and ran
into the exact same problem
Here is a thought/questionwhen the install asks me about whether this
install is the first node in the cluster - I am answering the question NO as I
already have a Pub installed. Is ea
Can mean several things. It can be that the call attempted to use a B channel
that isn't lit, the D channel may be down, or you may be attempting to route to
an endpoint that's not working and/or configured.
Check the debug q931 trace on the H323 gateway to see what it's doing at the
time th
Trouble loading CUPSWhen installing version 6 CUCM and CUPS, I've seen some
strangeness like this on production machines. Not sure what causes it.
If you can, boast the amount of RAM and processor available to both boxes
during the install. It seems to be related to a timeout between various
hi,
anybody have idea, call from PSTN to Branch-2 (H.323) sometimes did not go
thru and hv this error msg from PSTN GW
Cause i = 0x809B - Destination out of order
thks
I have installed 2 copies of CUCM Version 7 - both in VMWare on the same host.
On another host, also inside VMWare, I am trying to load CUPS Version 7
I created an ISO from the istall disk and created the guest VM. Specs used -
1.3 GB RAM, 75 GB HD. Initial install of Red Hat Linux goes well
On
Well you could put the ext 3102 on the second button for all the folks in the
group. But that gets them notificationnot notification on the primary
line.
Could you possibly assign 3102 as a secondary DN on line 1? I haven't tried
this, but assigning it as a secondary might get you there
thanks a lot people...
yeah so my guess was right abt the second problem.. i need a cube. so ur
additionally saying that i dont need a "seperate" cube and that i can do the
cube config on the 2 h.323 gateways itself(those having that voip
dial-peers)..k will look that today.
and thanks again
Does anyone know which version and feature set of IOS the HQ's 3750 is
supposed to have in the v3 lab?
--
-Shikamaru
Hi Cliff/Lim,
Thanks for ur response. I already did what you guys are suggesting. Ur
response confirm that I was on right path.
But what if the requirement is to notify all the members of GDM.
Example :
GDM phone number - 3100
CUE pilot - 3300
MWI on/off - 8000/8001
GDM notification on Ph1 line
Joel,
Your 1st problem: configure "tech-prefix" under DP config
!
dial-peer voice 1001 voip
destination-pattern
session target ras
tech-prefix
!
- this will auto-prepend DN with tech-prefix when sending ARQ to GK.
Your 2nd problem: to forward calls between two H.323 VoIP dialpeers you need
!
voi
I'd try another E1 card if you can locate one.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Holloway
To: 'Mark Holloway' ; 'Mike O' ; 'Cliff McGlamry' ;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725 w/VWIC-1MFT-E1 trouble
Mik
Mike,
According to the AIM-VOICE-30 page at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2641/products_data_sheet091
86a0080088753.html
Under Hardware Pre-requisites it states you can use the VWIC -MFT in a
chassis WIC slots or
Cisco 2691, 3700:
.http://www.cisco.com/warp/public
Mark,
I think you might need a NM-HDV, I can't find any docs where they are using a
VWIC-1MFT-E1 with a AIM-VOICE 30
- Original Message -
From: Mark Holloway
To: 'Mark Holloway' ; 'Mike O' ; 'Cliff McGlamry' ;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 5:55
I've opted to use a 2811 as my PSTN switch instead so I don't waste anymore
time troubleshooting [what I think is] a revision incompatibility. The
convenience of the 3725 was that it was supposed to be my Console Server,
Frame Switch, and PSTN emulation all-in-one. I just happen to have another
I
Thanks for responding. I am configuring the 3725 for PSTN emulation. I
have an AIM-VOICE-30 DSP module in the 3725. WIC0 houses the VWIC-2MFT-T1
and WIC1 houses the VWIC-1MFT-E1. I've tried moving them around but at this
point I can only conclude there must be a revision incompatibility with the
Mark,
Are you using the E1 for voice or data? if voice which NM are you using?
-Mike
- Original Message -
From: Mark Holloway
To: 'Cliff McGlamry' ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725 w/VWIC-1MFT-E1 troub
I totally agree with you Alex, NO I did not have the dial-peer voip to sub, so
the problem was real ridiculous :)
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Alex wrote:
From: Alex
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Not able to call a local number when Coris
applied on local dial-peer
To: "Sergio Polizer"
Cc: ccie_vo
If it was a bad card then I would expect it not to work on the 2811, but it
does. I cannot find anything on Cisco's web site that any VWIC-1MFT-E1
modules are incompatible with 3725 routers. :/
From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:38 PM
To: M
What you posted is the none secured working version. I'd suggest you post the
one that doesn't work.
Also, I find that sometimes after configuring these things I need to kick start
the CCM process on the servers for them to behave correctly.
- Original Message -
From: Josh Rein
On the first, do a show port qos 3/14 and look at the output there. It
should have a config and a runtime configuration for trust. The one for
config should be trust-cos. The runtime will say trust-cos* The * means
that you will need to use an ACL when you send it up to the switch
engine/P
sounds like either (1) incompatible card (check the release notes) or (2) bad
card.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Holloway
To: 'Mark Holloway' ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725 w/VWIC-1MFT-E1 trouble
I really don't get what why anyone would want to do this, but here's how I
would do it if you can't hard forward the ephone-dn to voicemail.
Create two ephone DN's like this:
ephone-dn 20<=== Assign this to your phones
number 1234
name GDM-Mailbox-dn
ephone-dn-21
number 1235 <=== Point
I got this working today. I'm not really convinced I did anything differently.
It might be that rebooting the router in the earlier session might have fixed
the problem.
I'm posting the full config where this worked since so many folks have been
asking questions about this. This particular s
hi,
in SRST mode, everything works fine, unless the unknown inbound call not hit
the 2003
config
-
call-manager-fallback
default-destination 2003
-
when I "show ephone registered" , showing 2003
This would only be significant in SRST situation when BR1 ephones are
registered to BR1 SRST router.
In situation where BR1 ephones are registered to CCM, inbound dial-peer for all
calls via BR1 H.323 GW
is dial-peer 101.
But, DP 101 does not have corlist at all, so it should be possible to plac
I did not, but I made my L0 my h323-voip interface. However, the issue I'm
having is with the CCM registration. I did not make any changes, however, I
see now that both are registered. I guess it just took some time.
Thanks,
Josh Reinmann, MCSE/CCVP
Fidelus Technologies, LLC
240 W. 35th St,
Did you configure "h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr" for CUME to 172.25.102.1/32?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Josh Reinmann wrote:
> When I have a gatekeeper set up without any security, I am able to get both
> CCM’s to register no problem. Once I put security on, only 1 registers. I’m
> no
Your incomming dial-peer has to be a SuperSet cor list of the Outgoing dial
peer.
In your e.g. the "corlist incoming css-pstn" at dial-peer 1 does not have the
members of the "corlist outgoing pt-911" .
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:57:11 -0700
From: anil...@yahoo.com
To: ms...@ipexpert.com
C
Yes, you are right.
Did i missed a point to the original scenario as I interpreted it as the
call forward rule was suppose to kick in during SRST mode.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Sergio Polizer wrote:
> Wesley,
>
> If the question states for a h323 Gw, we had to add some other digit
> mani
When I have a gatekeeper set up without any security, I am able to get both
CCM's to register no problem. Once I put security on, only 1 registers. I'm
not sure how to get both to register. My gatekeeper config is below:
gatekeeper
zone local UCM ipexpert.com 172.25.100.1
zone local UCME ipe
Wesley,
If the question states for a h323 Gw, we had to add some other digit
manipulation to allow the call-forward-all to work just in a SRST periods.
I mean, as it is not a MGCP Gw your dial-peer will take preference over the
other that are pointing to CM. Right?
> Date: Sat, 14 M
I know the 6500 will complain about trusting COS and DSCP on ports and
we should just ignore it, and go ahead and build the complimentary ACLs
to trust COS or DSCP on all traffic, but I think my 6500 is complaining
more than usual. Can someone please confirm the errors below are safely
ignorabl
Hi Narinder,
Sorry mate, dont quite catch what you on the first scenario.
Second scenario. If you want GDM notification on ANY dn - all u need to do
is to create a translation profile and tagged it to the dial-p of CUE. For
eg,
GDM phone number - 3100
CUE pilot - 3300
MWI on/off - 8000/8001
GDM
i see that there are 2 options..for gatekeeper with cucm... either "h225
gatekeeper" controlled trunk and "ict gatekeeper" controlled.
when doing either of these... i do successfully register my cucms as GW1 and
GW2 zones.. but i always get ARJ. Debug showed that the "e.164" called
numbers haven'
During the boot process on the 3725 this is what is displayed (with any
version of IOS I try)
*Mar 1 00:00:08.135: %E1T1_MODULE-3-INITFAILURE: Slot 0, Unit 1
initialization failure - FPGA Revision = 0x14
*Mar 1 00:00:08.135: %E1T1_MODULE-3-INITFAILURE: Slot 0, Unit 1
initialization failure -
All,
Requirement is : BACD call comes into the hunt group if noan/busy the call goes
to GDM . Also I need to show the system msg on the cme phone.
1. I can create GDM ephone-dn and forward all to VM and map the GDM ephone-dn
to the CME phones but by doing this I break the requirement of showing
I'm hoping someone can chime in and help out. I'm trying to setup a 3725 as
a PSTN switch. My VWIC-2MFT-T1 comes up fine but I'm having difficulty with
the VWIC-1MFT-E1. With IPVOICE-12.4.18T the router sees the E1 module but
displays "CONTROLLER E1 firmware not running" so I tried 12.4.23 Mainl
Hit to this issue before. Calls got through to BACD but no rtp,
ringback or media stream could be heard. Transcoder was configured on
cme and has confirmed that it was invoked during the GK call.
Kicked the router and restarted it and worked like a charm ever since.
On 3/14/09, Vik Malhi wrote:
This issue was troubling me a while ago. Rest assure that u can still
get it to work despite the redirecting bug on 12.4b.
Assuming that calls to 2002 (srst) to be forwarded to 1001 (hq)
immediately be it via internal or PSTN. Do the following
1. Create a translation profile of 2002 and translat
43 matches
Mail list logo
