It was a yes to all your questions
thanks
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Kumar, Narinder wrote:
> Yes what ??
>
>
>
> Problem fixed or you have all the config. correct ?
>
>
>
> *From:* Omotayo [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 November 2009 4:33 PM
> *To:* Kumar, Narinde
Yes what ??
Problem fixed or you have all the config. correct ?
From: Omotayo [mailto:adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 4:33 PM
To: Kumar, Narinder
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST
yes
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Kumar, Narinder
mailto:narinder.ku...
yes
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Kumar, Narinder wrote:
> Couple of things:-
>
>
>
> Have you applied the SRST reference to the device pool.
>
> Have you created ephone-dn and ephone under call-manager
>
> Is the source address under call-manager-fallback is same as the SRST ref
> in CUCm.
Couple of things:-
Have you applied the SRST reference to the device pool.
Have you created ephone-dn and ephone under call-manager
Is the source address under call-manager-fallback is same as the SRST ref in
CUCm.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlines
Hello,
i have srst configured but phones are moving failover over to srst
any one with an idea of whta i might ve overlooked
thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
This question always seems to pop up in different forms on this mailing
list. I've had this troubhle in the past and managed to overcome it before
but I am perplexed at it now.
HQ phones can dial SCCP phones at BR2. They can not dial SIP phones at
BR2. In the past, the recommendation has been t
Hello,
Sure. when i send the call with 011 it goes through
just need to confirm why the configuration on the pstn router does not
support the called party number type technology
thanks Otto
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
> Ok I see, you are right this is one of the purpo
Ok I see, you are right this is one of the purposes of the called number
type, ie that you shouldn't have to prepend an international access code
(011) if you are sending a called number type,
But at the end it depends on the pstn router requirements/configuration, for
that lab sending the call wi
Am working with lab 4. fabricated the question because i think it should be
possile. Guess that it is the essence of the called party number type.
Right?
Am using MGCP gateway. thus the config is GUI
thanks in advance
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
> Would please post your
Would please post your router config? which lab/task are you working with?
Thanks!
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Omotayo wrote:
> Hello,
> Am not using gatekeeper
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
>
>> Check the following (supposing you are using a gk scenari
Hello,
Am not using gatekeeper
thanks
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
> Check the following (supposing you are using a gk scenario, if not please
> clarify):
>
> 1.- Does your phone have the correct ccs to reach the pattern?
> 2.- Is your ucm trunk registered to the gk?
> 3.
Check the following (supposing you are using a gk scenario, if not please
clarify):
1.- Does your phone have the correct ccs to reach the pattern?
2.- Is your ucm trunk registered to the gk?
3.- Does the gk have the correct remote zone (pointing to the right address)
and prefix configured?
4- Is t
Q4.4 is dealing with registration to GK.
The dial-peer is created in the call routing section:
On the BR2-RTR:
voice translation-rule 15
rule 1 /^5...$/ /1#1212394\0/
rule 2 /^1...$/ /1#1617863\0/
!
voice translation-profile GK-OUT
translate called 15
!
dial-peer voice 15 voip
destination-p
You should be good with ios version 12.4(20)T and ip voice feature set for
that router, please take a look at this matrix,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/requirements/guide/33matrix.htm
--
Regards,
Otto Sanchez
CCIE #25592 (Voice), CCVP,CCSP,CCNP,CCDA,MCSE.
Sr. Support Eng
Hello,
i want to specify my international number pattern as 9011.91! with the
called party number type as International
setting my called party transformation discard digit as predot.
on doing this calls dont get to the India line which is specified as
international
Do i take it that the pstn ph
Sorry, I didn't copy the list
--
Regards,
Otto Sanchez
CCIE #25592 (Voice), CCVP,CCSP,CCNP,CCDA,MCSE.
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
> UCME version 4.3 is equivalent to 7.0, which is the one currently tes
This config is puzzling. There should at least be a dial peer on BR2
pointing to the gatekeep with *session target ras*. The only dial-peers
that seem to be pointing traffic to the 1 and 5 patterns are;
dial-peer voice 15 voip
destination-pattern [15]...$
voice-class codec 1
session protocol
I have been working with Labs 3a and to get my 2811 up and running has been
interesting. Question is - any reason IPX is using CME 4 and not CME 7?
--
www.ccietalk.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
I don't remember what is the exact requirements of Lab 4.4.
Are you sending any tech prefix from ur gateway's when they are registering
with the gatekeeper ?
Not sure what will happen if the gateways are registering with gatekeeper with
a different tech prefix and GK is using the default tech p
I'm very confused. In this question, we are told very explicitly in bulltet
3 that we are not allowed to use the default technology prefix sytnax. But,
in the final configuration file for the gatekeeper it's actually used;
*gatekeeper*
* zone local US ipexpert.com*
* zone local Spain ipexpert
Hi All,
I'm going through migrating Presence with CUCM and get to the
Presence, Service Parameters, Cisco UP SIP Proxy page and am being forced to
configure the "Federation Routing CUP FQDN" parameter which is causing
issues with the CUPS client connecting to the Presence server. I know i
Thanks All, Those are the results I had in my lab as well so one less thing
to worry about :)
-Original Message-
From: Andromeda Andromeda [mailto:diki...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Farkas
Péter
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 1:55 PM
To: Robert McGhee
Cc: Daryl Smith; OSL Group; Vik Malhi
Su
Some points.
At this time CUCM is not able to manipulate redirecting number (except VM
profile). This causes side effect in a situation when final called party is
off-net to a CUCM cloud (reached over a trunk) and redirecting number have
to be a full E.164. This easily happens when a phone regis
Disregard! I need to pay more attention! Sorry for the stupid post!
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM, CCIETalk.com wrote:
> What version CUCME is recommended for the voice lab? I tried looking it up
> at the learning network but did not see it mentioned anywhere.
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> --
> www.cci
What version CUCME is recommended for the voice lab? I tried looking it up
at the learning network but did not see it mentioned anywhere.
Thanks guys!
--
www.ccietalk.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please vis
In my personal experience I got used to the following to gain some speed:
1.- Although not a secret, use notepad for all your IOS configurations, it’s
a better editor that the ios command line itself,
2.- As you I use ctrl+insert, shift+insert a lot, to copy and paste, it
works also in notepa
Yeah after it registered with the PUB I went ahead and added the SUB back
into the cluster. Restarted the UCM adn TFTP services on both and boom that
same phone registered with Sub. So I think since it registered with SCCP
before and may be it was not pulling the profile?
There was no replication
Now now- let's not get carried away:-)
Looks like root cause might be a replication issue (any weird behavior
like this normally is). See if you can register back to the SUB - if
not you should repair dbreplication from the pub cmd line.
Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890
Senior Technical Instructor -
That did it! Thank you Vik! No wonder you are world famous :)
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vik Malhi wrote:
> Take the SUB out of the CCM Group and restart TFTP and UCM services. It
> looks like the configuration file is not being updated with the correct
> device protocol. Also you have t
Congrats!
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Vik Malhi wrote:
> We are happy to announce a new member of our team.
> *
>
> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2009/11/16/amy-ryan-joins-the-ipexpert-team/
> *
> --
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810
I think the R&S momentum will be shifting over to us this year
toothe stuff we're working on is unmatched. ;-)
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpe
I dont think there is ANY doubt about that. I am a huge INE fan when it
comes to R&S but for voice I dont think IPX has any competition. yes I own
IPX and INE Voice workbooks :) now if I can only AFFORD the bootcamp then
life will be GREAT :D
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Wayne Lawson wrote:
Page 142 (chapter 7-8) of the Features and Services guide talks briefly
about Globalization and Localization on transfer and forward.
In effect the original calling number will be used when the transfer
completes.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telepho
You've got it! ;-)
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130
::Message sent from iPhone::
IPexpert is a premier provider of
Congratulations!
So it seems to be that IPX has the best study materials for the V3-Lab.
Since July there has been 12 Voice-CCIEs on IPX Success Stories. Half of
them passed in the last 3 weeks.
Checking other vendors, none of them has so many passing students for
the new lab.
Aamir Panjwan
We are happy to announce a new member of our team.
http://blog.ipexpert.com/2009/11/16/amy-ryan-joins-the-ipexpert-team/
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Join our free online su
Take the SUB out of the CCM Group and restart TFTP and UCM services. It
looks like the configuration file is not being updated with the correct
device protocol. Also you have to assign a DN to a SIP phone for it to
register.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
You should set the significant digits from the gateway configuration page, “I
think you made it from the trunk configuration page”
Thanks and best regards,
EHAB SALEM
Cisco Instructor | Sigma IT – Egypt
LOGO6.png
Suez Canal Tower, 70 El-Nil St., Level 14, 26, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Tel:
38 matches
Mail list logo
