That was it!
yes, had checked Enterprise subscription!.
deleted that phone service and added another one WITHOUT the Enterprise
subscription.. now, I see the EM in the pull down menu.
thanks much,
/Baktha
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Roger Carpio wrote:
> Did you check the option "Enterprise
I believe once you make EM an Enterprise service it will no longer be a
individually subscribed service, in orher words every device will be subscribed
to it and you then just check the enable EM check box on the
Phone Device Page.
Best Regards
Larry
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:3
Users complain. It feels like you are using a walkie talkie. Hard to have
a conversation that
On Feb 9, 2011 1:34 PM, "CCIE" wrote:
> You can see clipping at the beginning of people speaking after silence.
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:44 AM, "Farkas Péter" wrote:
>
>> Also can source voice quality
Did you check the option "Enterprise Subscription" when you created the
service?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Baktha Muralidharan wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> As part of lab 9A, I configured phone service for extension mobility, with
> service URL etc. I then restarted the E
yes, enable checked.
thanks.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, wrote:
> Did you check the enable check box?
> -Original Message-
> From: Baktha Muralidharan
> Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:50:09
> To:
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone service
Did you check the enable check box?
-Original Message-
From: Baktha Muralidharan
Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:50:09
To:
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone service doesn't show
___
For more information
Hello,
As part of lab 9A, I configured phone service for extension mobility, with
service URL etc. I then restarted the EM service under “CM Servicability”
page.
However, when I go into the Subscribe/Unsubscribe services page for a phone
or device profile, I don’t see the [EM] service in the p
Hi Ron,
The point is that this is the expected behavior. If you don't want your
screen cluttered you can use the privacy button to toggle privacy on/off in
order to go from 2 displays to 1. To my knowledge there is no service
parameter, feature, or anything else besides the privacy setting to ef
I think what Matt meant was if you have a privacy button on one of the other
lines, you can toggle between seeing two displays or one by using the
privacy on/off button.
Try this and see if it produces the results you desire.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudyli
hmmm?
is this a "feature" :)
doesn't the phone have to do this itself ?
because the cbarge is active and working acros the 3 phones.
Ron
> While on the barged call, hit privacy and you'll see that second "call" go
> away.
> Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721
>
> Email: matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com
> Tw
While on the barged call, hit privacy and you'll see that second "call" go away.
Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721
Email: matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/CiscoVoiceGuru
Blog: http://ciscovoiceguru.com
On Feb 9, 2011, at 12:07 PM, rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote:
> hello matthew,
>
> p
You can see clipping at the beginning of people speaking after silence.
On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:44 AM, "Farkas Péter" wrote:
> Also can source voice quality issues like hissing.
>
> Peter
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com"
> Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011 5
Also can source voice quality issues like hissing.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com"
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011 5:16 pm
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] why is vad bad?
To: "Stutz, Bernhard"
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> I've always understood
Per Cisco, when VAD is enabled, it contributes to a slightly degraded sound
quality.
Also, VAD is to be disabled on both sides of a FAX connection as it can
interfere with the successful reception of the fax traffic.
Per experience, unless VAD actually alleviates bandwidth problem, it is likely
This is affected by the privacy feature. If privacy is turned on you won't see
that.
Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721
Email: matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/CiscoVoiceGuru
Blog: http://ciscovoiceguru.com
On Feb 9, 2011, at 10:31 AM, rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote:
> hi everyone,
Hm this depends on your available ISDN Channels.
You may have 1000 phones but you can only have for example max 30 or
lets say 60 channels available if you have a standard PRI to PSTN.
You may run into this issue if you got a SIP Trunk to a SIP Provider
with multiple channels but 60 voip legs sh
hi everyone,
i was wondering if it's "as it should work"
when i configure and use CBarge, al works fine.
but on the phone there are 2 call (lines) shown.
is this correct, or am i missing a "secret" service parameter.
Ron
___
For more information reg
I've always understood that VAD results in a higher CPU utilization. For a
site of 10 phones running a 2921 it wouldn't be an issue. However, if you're
running several hundred (or thousand) users running off the same pool of
devices then you'd run into a significant impact on CPU performance.
Hi,
i am just wondering why vad is bad and we all learn as a rule of thumb
to disable vad on all voip dial peers?
When you have a look for what vad has been designed for it looks to me
as a valuable algorithm
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_activity_detection)
Whats the reason we di
My idea is the router need to produce a 1x g711 stream. If I'm not wrong , this
will take 15 MIPS from dsp resource. If there's no dsp, I doubt it works?
Sent from my iPhone
Pls pardon my fat fingers.
On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:33 PM, ccieid1ot wrote:
> Never heard that.
>
> duy
> ccie #27737 voic
Since telephony-service and call-manager-fallback commands are used/required
for SRST I thought it is used for SIP phones also only when configuring
SRST.
Thanks for clarifying it.
_
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
21 matches
Mail list logo
