Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 lab 5 (Transformation to 7 and 10 digits) to call 911

You don't need to check traces. You need to check your configuration. El sáb, 12-03-2011 a las 01:33 +0200, Ahmed Ellboudy escribió: > Dear All, > > I am working on this lab and I can call 911, but the PSTN phone > display the 4 digits only for HQ and BR1 while in the question it was > requested

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I failed because of MGCP issue- need help

That is not an error. El vie, 11-03-2011 a las 09:42 +0300, Support escribió: > Dear Frineds, > > > > I failed in my first attempt as I could not register HQ and BR1 > gateway in CUCM as MGCP GW. > > My router name for HQ was R1 and for branch R2 and Domain name > configured on both routers

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phoneview Unified FX

hi,   Does anyone know how to control phone using Unified FX so it can place call, conference ,etc?  (not thru "Line select")   I thought  Unified FX would be like Berbee Phone control ???   Thanks,   erwan     ___ For more information regarding indust

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 lab 5 (Transformation to 7 and 10 digits) to call 911

Dear All, I am working on this lab and I can call 911, but the PSTN phone display the 4 digits only for HQ and BR1 while in the question it was requested to display 7 digits for HQ and 10 digits for BR1 , so can anyone guide me for the traces I need to collect to get my mistake ? Thanks,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCX - Debug Script - Lab 12A - Vol I

Hello, I've edited the script using script editor to display ANI for 617 in workbook Vol 1 (IPCC) But when a debug the script it show me an error msg ANI=Get Call Contact Info (--Triggering Contact --, Calling Number ) Error msg : Task:1600035 GetCallContactInfoStep (HandledSessionS

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Hunting - not getting Original Called party number

Hello, I would be glad if someone can help in this. I am working on a CME hunting setup for a customer where when a call is not answered/busy on any phone, it will start ringing a hubt listcustomer has reported that although hunting is working perfectly fine but the problem is when it sta

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I failed because of MGCP issue- need help

Hi Raj, To avoid any typos or any confusion I always the info from "sh ccm mananger" output Next time when you lab it, you may want to use the output from the command and copy paste (as Ms Ryan suggests :)) Regards Sam Wilson From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA-ZONE with remote ZONE

If you are using CUBE then you shouldn't have dial peer to remote gateway, the call should be sent back to the gatekeeper, hope you've registered the HQ gateway to the CUBE zone, you only need the outvia as you are only sending calls to the remote zone so the dial peer you need would be like dial-

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I failed because of MGCP issue- need help

Hi Raj, well alway use the output of the sh ccm-manager command to know the name you would use to register with in the call manager. also do a sh inventory to identify the right device module and card. Also don't forget to add the bind-l3 ccm-manager under the serial y/y/y:23 interface and ccm-ma

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Transcoder requirement for ICD and CUE

Looks correct to me. Also don't forget to take care of xcoder in any SRST situation, or anything else than xcoder for that matter. Easy thing to forget, but would be really bad for your score :) ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. ** 11 mar 2011 kl. 21:51 skrev "Rah

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Transcoder requirement for ICD and CUE

Hi Roger , sorry for delay response. Still one thing is not very clear for me what is you allowed to configure on two gateway to answer this question 1. enough DSP resource should be available on both gateway to configure 3 session of 3 transcoding session 2. for the xocoder which will be us

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA-ZONE with remote ZONE

Yes Adam , you are right. I missed it earlier .. working fine now :) thx for help Rahul On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:11 AM, adam compton wrote: > You have to have to have an outbound dial-peer to the remote gateway in > that scenario. I don't think the VIA would work going to a remote zone > gat

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA-ZONE with remote ZONE

You have to have to have an outbound dial-peer to the remote gateway in that scenario. I don't think the VIA would work going to a remote zone gatekeeper, but I could be wrong. I know you can use hopoff as well. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Rahul Kapor wrote: > Hi All, > > I am able to send

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA-ZONE with remote ZONE

Hi Rahul - make sure your cube incoming and outgoing dial peers are set to support calls to br2 and the relevent translation profile is applied to strip of tech prefix. thks Brian On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Rahul Kapor wrote: > Hi All, > > I am able to send call to remote gatekeeper and

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA-ZONE with remote ZONE

You might need an outbound dial-peer on your cube with destination-pattern 4#4...$ On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Rahul Kapor wrote: > Hi All, > > I am able to send call to remote gatekeeper and calls are working fine. > > but when i m introducing CUBE , my calls are failing > > here is the loc

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA-ZONE with remote ZONE

Hi All, I am able to send call to remote gatekeeper and calls are working fine. but when i m introducing CUBE , my calls are failing here is the local gatekeeper config zone local HQ cisco.com 14.160.110.254 zone local CUCM cisco.com zone local CUBE cisco.com zone remote BR1 cisco.com 14.16

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan -CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note.

-- Forwarded message -- From: adam compton Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan -CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note. To: lakpr...@gmail.com I would also like to inform engineers out there, the Japan C

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan -CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note.

As a victim of 2004 tsunami I pray and I wish safetly for each and every person that looks for the hope out there. Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from du -Original Message- From: Vik Malhi Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:19:13 To: Jon 199

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan - CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note.

Jon (and everybody else in Japan)- hope you are safe. The images on TV look shocking. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:24 AM, "Jon 1992" wrote: >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

Shutdown the voice-port is in my opinion the best way to simulate a PSTN down. You also have to change the service parameter "Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag" to false, it's set to true default. About this "I am not using a "voice class H323" on my dial-peers", voice class H323 only app

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Forward Unregistered

Try adding dial-plan pattern 213303 extension length 4 under SRST config. On 3/11/2011 7:07 AM, adam compton wrote: All, I have a very specific thing I am trying to do with Call forward unregistered. When the call comes into the SRST phone it should show the "for" and "by fields". This

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

Under respective voice-port issue a shutdown command. Example: BR2-RTR# config t BR2-RTR (config)# voice-port 0/0/0:23 BR2-RTR (config)# shutdown On 3/11/2011 7:00 AM, adam compton wrote: I have a Route List setup to go to a BR1 H323 gateway first, and then fall back to the HQ h323 gateway if

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

After George's suggestion, I found a pretty good blog about this exact topic: http://ccierants.blogspot.com/2010/07/call-routing-redundancy-stuff.html A definite must-read. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:35 AM, adam compton wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: adam compton

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

-- Forwarded message -- From: adam compton Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:35 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323 To: George Goglidze Thanks George! I'm going to try that in the lab this weekend! On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Geor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

sorry did not say what you have to set it to, "Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag Required Field" to false... by defualt it true. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:31 PM, George Goglidze wrote: > in call manager service parameters set "Stop Routing on Unallocated Number > Flag Required Field" > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

in call manager service parameters set "Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag Required Field" Regards, On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:00 PM, adam compton wrote: > I have a Route List setup to go to a BR1 H323 gateway first, and then fall > back to the HQ h323 gateway if BR1 is unavailable. I set

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan - CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note.

I am local Give it 3 days and all will be ok, so basically Monday should be ok for any lab candidates. From: ShinGei Yong Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:01 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan - CCIE Candidates in Japan pl

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Forward Unregistered

All, I have a very specific thing I am trying to do with Call forward unregistered. When the call comes into the SRST phone it should show the "for" and "by fields". This field should have the e.164 number of the phone instead of the extension number. So, I can configure Redirecting ie elements

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup Route Group in a Route List with H323

I have a Route List setup to go to a BR1 H323 gateway first, and then fall back to the HQ h323 gateway if BR1 is unavailable. I set this up and calls to the first gateway work fine. The problem is, when I shut down the dial-peer for that call in the BR1 gateway, the call fails instead of going ba

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QoS for MLP LFI

While I have not sat in the lab and am still some time away from it, I would say that it seems that the CCIE Lab exams are a situation where stress and strict time limits can cause people with excellent skills to make little mistakes. Those mistakes cost time and energy which you want to conserve.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QoS for MLP LFI

While I have not sat the lab and am still some time away from it, I would say that it seems the CCIE Lab exams are a situation where stress and strict time limits can cause people with excellent skills to make little mistakes. Those mistakes cost time and energy which you want to conserve. While y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I failed because of MGCP issue- need help

-- Forwarded message -- From: adam compton Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:00 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I failed because of MGCP issue- need help To: Support Did you have the MGCP control binded to the loopback or another interface? If so, you have to remove the binding,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 8.9 magnitute Earth Quake hit North Japan - CCIE Candidates in Japan please take note.

Hi All, A gently reminder to all ccie candidates who booked or intend to Japan ccie lab. Japan major airports Narita and Haneda have been evacuated and stop operation. Source: CNN Asia Tsunami warning issued for at least 5

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM vs QOS SRNDs

Both source of values would be accepted, this is based on that all calculations on the lab typically have a 10% error margin. So if the outcome of your calculation is with-in 10% of what the intended answer say you should be good. Sincerely Roger Källberg CCIE #26199 (Voice) Consultant Cygate A

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM vs QOS SRNDs

As both values are in Cisco's SRNDs which are both available on candidates desktop, both values should be accepted in my opinion. and I mean of course the CCIE Voice lab exam not the real life network. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:44 AM, ShinGei Yong wrote: > Hi George, > > When you said "both wo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM vs QOS SRNDs

Hi George, When you said "both would be an acceptable answer on a lab",you mean real exam lab or practice lab? Personally think there's only one acceptable value,but of course both might accepted during exam. If not wrong (and this topic has been bring up multiple times in OSL or Ask the expert)B

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM vs QOS SRNDs

Hi all, There is inconsistency between the two SRNDs on how much Layer 2 overhead is to be used for voice traffic calculations. CUCM SRND states the following: CODEC Header Type and Size Ethernet 14 Bytes PPP 6 Bytes ATM 53-Byte Cells with a 48-Byte Payload Frame Relay 4 Bytes MLPPP 10 Bytes MP

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QoS for MLP LFI

I don't really have problem with forgetting enabling FRTS on the serial interface, worked for ISP for a while on FR implementations, so have done that quite a few times. and with a simple "show frame-relay dlci" you know you've forgotten to do it... from the answers I get, I think I'm going to sti