Hi all,
When configuring Location Based Call admission control if we assumed that
we need to configure only 5 g729 calls needs to be send what would be the
best config. As I know it should be 24XN + 16 should be the bandwidth which
requires. 24 X 5 +16 of only 24X5 is enough.
Thanks,
Ravi.
__
You'd need to add the recording step to the script and a document type
variable. Then you'd need to assign that variable under properties of the
recording step against the result document..
Practice it number of times. Another thing, this recording step stores the
prompts under temp folder inside
Hi All,
Do we need to enable ip rsvp bandwidth command when we configure location
based CAC.
Thanks,
Ravi.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job
If RSVP is in question, +16 is required, otherwise 24x number of required
calls is okay.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:20 PM, ie ravindra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When configuring Location Based Call admission control if we assumed that
> we need to configure only 5 g729 calls needs to be send what wou
Hi
Yes you have to add the command ip rsvp bandwidth 140 for example into the
frame relay interface pointed to the branch that you will enable the cac and
vice versa
also are some extra config into the cucm for location cac
Regards
Chrysostomos
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.co
Again it depends on if you are asked to do so.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:56 PM, ie ravindra wrote:
> Hi All,
> Do we need to enable ip rsvp bandwidth command when we configure location
> based CAC.
>
> Thanks,
> Ravi.
>
> ___
> For more information re
It should be pretty clear whether to use it or not
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2013, at 6:07 AM, "Suresh Bhandari" wrote:
> Again it depends on if you are asked to do so.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:56 PM, ie ravindra wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Do we need to enable ip rsvp bandwidth comman
The two types of CAC are locations-based and RSVP-based. On CUCM they both
have a configuration set on the location page, which may seem confusing at
first. The key words to watch for in the scenario will be "once bw is
exceeded reroute call over PSTN" means you need AAR, which could be either
lo
One more comment on CAC, but for the real world not for the lab...
Locations CAC is quick and easy to setup, you don't touch the routers at
all. The downside is it is really designed for a hub and spoke topology
and it does not account for multiple circuits.
RSVP on the other hand is path-aware,
Great walk through but just one note, this is for g729 calls which surely you
will be doing but just to be sure you don't use these numbers with g711 ;)
Bill
On Jan 30, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Justin Carney wrote:
> The two types of CAC are locations-based and RSVP-based. On CUCM they both
> have
Thanks for that explanation Justin. Makes it a bit "simpler" to understand.
Joel P
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Justin Carney
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:11 AM
To: Suresh Bhandari
Cc: CCIE Study; ie r
For G711 with RSVP, it would be 80k*+16k, right?
Sergey
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bill wrote:
> Great walk through but just one note, this is for g729 calls which surely
> you will be doing but just to be sure you don't use these numbers with g711
> ;)
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2013, at
Thanks all who responded!
Regards,
Hugo
On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:09 PM, "Chrysostomos Christofi"
mailto:ch.christ...@logicom.net>> wrote:
Agree with cory
I believe we need also in the recording step except doc also and prompt
variable assigned to this media
attached is a working recording scri
Hi Vik,
I am unable to access CFUR blog link it is displaying 404 error message.
http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/04/05/cfur-and-ucm-7.0-new-features/
Can you please correct this.?
Thanks & Regards,
Ramcharan Arya
___
For more information regarding indus
Please unsubscribe -Thx
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Sergey Heyphets wrote:
> For G711 with RSVP, it would be 80k*+16k, right?
>
> Sergey
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> Great walk through but just one note, this is for g729 calls which surely
>> you will be doing but
Is there a known bug with max-dn 30 no-reg in that ephone-dns still register
to gatekeeper? Anyone got a bug id?
Pretty clear it don't work, you have to put no-reg in the ephone-dn itself.
-jason
___
For more information regarding industry lead
Hi Jason,
If you put command max-dn 30 no-reg both you need to reboot the router then
phone will not register into Gatekeeper with alias.
Regards,
Ramcharan Arya
CCIE # 28926 ( R&S)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Jason Aarons wrote:
> Is there a known bug with max-dn 30 no-reg in that epho
I noticed this behavior as well. Not sure if there a bug id on it. I still do
it on max-dn because I became very paranoid about how the exam is graded so i
put it on just in case the grading script looks for it. I doubt it but you
never know
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2013, at 9:22 PM,
Dear All,
Thanks for your great explanation which I gained lots about the CAC I
believe.
Thanks again.
Ravi.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Sergey Heyphets wrote:
> For G711 with RSVP, it would be 80k*+16k, right?
>
> Sergey
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> Great walk
19 matches
Mail list logo
