Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST in CME only deployment??

2009-01-15 Thread wafers44
It may not be called SRST, but could your friend be referencing to the 'ip source-address x.x.x.x secondary' command? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_i1ht.html#wp1012400 ** (Optional) Second Cisco Unified CME router with which phones can register if the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Layer 2 overhead

2009-01-14 Thread wafers44
FR = 4 bytes FRF.12 = 8 bytes Agreed. For MLPoFR (w/ or w/out LFI - but in our case we would only be using MLP for LFI) I've been using 4B (FR) + 13B (MLP). Also, in all the IPExpert solution guides for Volume 3 atleast they've been using 4B+13B for MLPoFR On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ryan

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] For MLP, is TS required?

2009-01-14 Thread wafers44
I understand that when configuring LLQ w/ FR, TS is required. If we configured FRF.12, TS is also required. Several questions; 1. If we configure MLP alone, is TS required? I was under the assumption that it's not required. Going by Volume 3 L5 Q43, the solutions doesn't have TS configured when

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CM call to CME Phone and CME puts CM on park... call disconnects

2009-01-11 Thread wafers44
>From the CME router, can you collect the following debugs and send it as a txt attachment? debug voip ccapi inout debug ras debug h225 asn1 debug h245 asn1 Configure 'service sequence-numbers' as well. On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Ryan Trauernicht wrote: > The TCS was unchecked already. M

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK Hopoff command preference

2009-01-11 Thread wafers44
AFAIK, the GK will load balance (random select) b/w the endpoints registered to the zone that you are trying to hopoff to. I don't believe there's a way to set a preference among the endpoints registered to the hopoff zone. If you don't want CM to register w/ a TP, can you configure a TP on the GK

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Type-o in the solutions of Vol3 L7?

2009-01-10 Thread wafers44
In the dial plan section of the solutions for Volume 3 Lab 7 the solutions mention - "Make sure that the 'Provide Outside Dialtone' checkbox is NOT marked on any of the Route Patterns,..." - pg 86 right below the dial plan table. I'm guessing that they mean the reverse?

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DSP Session Calculations

2009-01-07 Thread wafers44
For DSP calculations for voice termination- PVDM-12's - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_tech_note09186a00800b65d6.shtml Each PVDM-12 contains 3 TI 549 DSPs. - Runs up to twelve voice calls using a medium complexity CODEC (G.711, G.729a/b, G.726, fax). -

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Script only working on pots, not voip dialpeer

2009-01-07 Thread wafers44
It should work w/ SIP. The only snag you can run into is if you configure the dtmf-relay types to be different for the outbound/inbound SIP dial-peer. Can you try changing dial-peer 3500 to the following and test? dial-peer voice 3500 voip service aa destination-pattern 3500 session target ipv4

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cRTP

2009-01-07 Thread wafers44
Thanks Ryan! On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Ryan Trauernicht wrote: > It would be post compression. > > The priority queue is based on "output" assuming you are applying it on the > output of the interface. > > Thanks, > Ryan Trauernicht > > > On Tue,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cRTP

2009-01-06 Thread wafers44
If we apply cRTP on the FR interface using "frame-relay ip rtp header-compression", would our priority-map bandwidth values for rtp be based on pre-compression or post-compression? interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay class fr-mapclass frame-relay in