I believe you should assume 1536. When using b8zs / ESF, you loose a few bits for overhead. Showing my age, I recall converting circuits from AMI to b8zs and we needed to adjust the line speed accordingly. As for the other, the question should provide you the port speed of the link.
Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions 7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/ ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:47 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBWFQ without specific PVC bandwidth data Hi all: I was testing this but I am not sure what have I to assume. If some reason we don´t have the PVC bandwidth for a specific connection, for example between HQ and BR1, and we have to configure 33% for voice and 5% for signaling, what sould we have to assume?, that it is a T1?, or left the PVC in the default value 56 kbps?, and if we assume a T1 what would be the bandwidth?, 1536?, 1544? Any ideas? Regards, Jose Gregorio Linero Welcker Systems Engineer - Service Provider - CCIP - CCVP Sales / Channels [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone :+(571) 3256052 Mobile :+(57) 310 2634216 Fax :+(571) 3256090 Carrera 7 # 71-21 Torre A Piso 17 Colombia www.cisco.com/global/CO/ <http://www.cisco.com/global/CO/> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
<<image004.gif>>
<<image005.gif>>
<<image006.gif>>
