Hello,
I have an issue with one of our customer where the call diversion is not
working properly.
The incoming number (352999) to extension 2602 after 1800hrs.
Ext. 2602 has voicemail setup on it, which works internally and also when
dialled as DDI - but this does not work when calls are d
resuming to the original called number is the expected behaviour.
remove call-coverage settings from 2999 or disable it's diversion to vm.
hth
On 6/9/10, Ashar Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have an issue with one of our customer where the call diversion is not
> working properly.
>
> The in
Thanks Wolf,
If I disable VM on 2999, will an incoming call go to VM of2602?
-Original Message-
From: wolfsrudel [mailto:wolfsru...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 June 2010 13:33
To: Ashar Siddiqui; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion
resuming to
Just make 2999 an alternate ext of 2602.
HTH,
Brian
- Reply message -
From: "Ashar Siddiqui"
Date: Wed, Jun 9, 2010 8:37 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion
To: "'wolfsrudel'" ,
Thanks Wolf,
If I disable VM on 2999, will an
Original Message-
> From: wolfsrudel [mailto:wolfsru...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 09 June 2010 13:33
> To: Ashar Siddiqui; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion
>
> resuming to the original called number is the expected behaviour
: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion
Just make 2999 an alternate ext of 2602.
HTH,
Brian
- Reply message -
From: "Ashar Siddiqui"
Date: Wed, Jun 9, 2010 8:37 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC Voicmeail diversion
To: "'wolfsrudel'" ,
Thank
