h be value (single color
dual bucket).
Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of datucha123
datucha123
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 2:49 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Vo
As I guess the FRTS uses the Average Shaping method, am I right?
Also, when using shaping, either FRTS or any other variant, we have to
always set Be to 0, when the Voice is also traversing that Shaper. Correct?
___
For more information regarding industr
They are equivalent.
With config A you must enable FRTS on the physical interface, with config B you
must not.
Config B is invalid with MLP LFI.
--
Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.
Both will have the same result, but the first one is called Frame Relay
Traffic Shaping, and second is called Class Based Traffic Shaping.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael Luo wrote:
> I was trying to understand if the two configuration below achieve the same
> thing. If not, what's the
A is Frame Relay traffic shaping and the other is class based shaping.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Michael Luo wrote:
> I was trying to understand if the two configuration below achieve the same
> thing. If not, what's the difference?
>
> Configuration A:
>
> map-class frame-relay FRTS
> f
I was trying to understand if the two configuration below achieve the same
thing. If not, what's the difference?
Configuration A:
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay cir 768000
frame-relay bc 7680
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 768000
Configuration B:
map-class frame-relay FRTS
se
Hi,
In my opinion if you have such scanario you should use "class based frts"
which does not require frame-relay traffice-shaping command on physical
interface.
So you can configure shaping for one PVC not affecting the other.
--
Best regards,
Bartosz
2011/6/1 adam compton
> So I have a questi
estudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Roger Carpio
> *Sent:* mercredi 1 juin 2011 17:21
> *To:* adam compton
> *Cc:*
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test
>
>
>
> If you're not been provi
st.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger
Carpio
Sent: mercredi 1 juin 2011 17:21
To: adam compton
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is
acceptable. That's t
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable.
That's the one I use.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton wrote:
> So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the
> Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the
Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic shaping
will be enabled. I know it will use the bandwidth that you configure for
shaping. I also understand on the HQ router, the link to SiteC would
defau
http://www.ipexpert.com/>
From: Ehab Salem
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:00:19 +0400
To: 'Omotayo' ,
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping
If you are configuring FRF.12 you have to write frame-relay traffic shaping
under the physical interface to
, 2010 6:38 AM
To: bkvalent...@gmail.com
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping
thanks
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:33 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wouldn't waste time configuring anything that won't earn you points. The
test isn't about
k with the proctor.
>
> Brian
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "Omotayo"
> Date: Sun, May 9, 2010 9:09 pm
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping
> To: "OSL Group"
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> If questions does not explici
Date: Sun, May 9, 2010 9:09 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping
To: "OSL Group"
Hello all,
If questions does not explicitly say we should configure shaping.
Do we have to on the physical interface?
thanks
___
For more inf
Hello all,
If questions does not explicitly say we should configure shaping.
Do we have to on the physical interface?
thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Chris,
According to the QOS SRND bc = cir/100.
Sergio.
From: christopherc_56...@hotmail.comto: ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.comdate:
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0600Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay
Traffic-Shaping Calculations
I'm trying to figure out the calculations for the
I'm trying to figure out the calculations for the frame-relay traffic-shaping
parameters.
In the Volume 1 Workbook, it states that cir and mincir should 95% of the PVC
speed. I'm set for that one, but how do you get the Bc?
I've found reference that it should be CIR/8=Bc. But all of the conf
I'd probably point you to the QoS SRND for a full discussion, but I had
thought that the fragmentation-delay command was only for PPP?
I will be in very bad trouble if I get caught doing this today (12/24), but
check this out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_
Hi,
In frame relay traffic shaping, when we should use fragmentation-delay or
frame-relay fragmentation.
Could you please explain this both in detail?
Thanks,
Bala.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Monasmith
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:42 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic shaping
Is there a difference/preference to configure shaping on Frame-Relay with
Class-based vs. Map-Class Frame-Relay?
policy-m
Is there a difference/preference to configure shaping on Frame-Relay with
Class-based vs. Map-Class Frame-Relay?
policy-map FRTS
class class-default
shape average 729600 72960 0
VS.
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay cir 729600
frame-relay bc 7296
frame-relay be -
frame-relay mincir 7
22 matches
Mail list logo