Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame Relay Traffic Shaping

2011-12-06 Thread Mohammed Al Baqari
h be value (single color dual bucket). Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of datucha123 datucha123 Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 2:49 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Vo

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame Relay Traffic Shaping

2011-12-04 Thread datucha123 datucha123
As I guess the FRTS uses the Average Shaping method, am I right? Also, when using shaping, either FRTS or any other variant, we have to always set Be to 0, when the Voice is also traversing that Shaper. Correct? ___ For more information regarding industr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame Relay Traffic Shaping

2011-06-04 Thread Vik Malhi
They are equivalent. With config A you must enable FRTS on the physical interface, with config B you must not. Config B is invalid with MLP LFI. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame Relay Traffic Shaping

2011-06-04 Thread Randall Saborio
Both will have the same result, but the first one is called Frame Relay Traffic Shaping, and second is called Class Based Traffic Shaping. On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Michael Luo wrote: > I was trying to understand if the two configuration below achieve the same > thing. If not, what's the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame Relay Traffic Shaping

2011-06-04 Thread adam compton
A is Frame Relay traffic shaping and the other is class based shaping. On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Michael Luo wrote: > I was trying to understand if the two configuration below achieve the same > thing. If not, what's the difference? > > Configuration A: > > map-class frame-relay FRTS > f

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame Relay Traffic Shaping

2011-06-04 Thread Michael Luo
I was trying to understand if the two configuration below achieve the same thing. If not, what's the difference? Configuration A: map-class frame-relay FRTS frame-relay cir 768000 frame-relay bc 7680 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 768000 Configuration B: map-class frame-relay FRTS se

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-02 Thread Bartosz Sokolowski
Hi, In my opinion if you have such scanario you should use "class based frts" which does not require frame-relay traffice-shaping command on physical interface. So you can configure shaping for one PVC not affecting the other. -- Best regards, Bartosz 2011/6/1 adam compton > So I have a questi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
estudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Roger Carpio > *Sent:* mercredi 1 juin 2011 17:21 > *To:* adam compton > *Cc:* > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test > > > > If you're not been provi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread Friderich Claude
st.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Roger Carpio Sent: mercredi 1 juin 2011 17:21 To: adam compton Cc: Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable. That's t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread Roger Carpio
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable. That's the one I use. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton wrote: > So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the > Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test

2011-06-01 Thread adam compton
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic shaping will be enabled. I know it will use the bandwidth that you configure for shaping. I also understand on the HQ router, the link to SiteC would defau

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping

2010-05-10 Thread Vik Malhi
http://www.ipexpert.com/> From: Ehab Salem Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:00:19 +0400 To: 'Omotayo' , Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping If you are configuring FRF.12 you have to write frame-relay traffic shaping under the physical interface to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping

2010-05-10 Thread Ehab Salem
, 2010 6:38 AM To: bkvalent...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping thanks On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:33 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote: I wouldn't waste time configuring anything that won't earn you points. The test isn't about

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping

2010-05-09 Thread Omotayo
k with the proctor. > > Brian > > - Reply message - > From: "Omotayo" > Date: Sun, May 9, 2010 9:09 pm > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping > To: "OSL Group" > > > Hello all, > > If questions does not explici

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping

2010-05-09 Thread bkvalent...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, May 9, 2010 9:09 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping To: "OSL Group" Hello all, If questions does not explicitly say we should configure shaping. Do we have to on the physical interface? thanks ___ For more inf

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame relay traffic shaping

2010-05-09 Thread Omotayo
Hello all, If questions does not explicitly say we should configure shaping. Do we have to on the physical interface? thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay Traffic-Shaping Calculations

2009-02-13 Thread Sergio Polizer
Chris, According to the QOS SRND bc = cir/100. Sergio. From: christopherc_56...@hotmail.comto: ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.comdate: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0600Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay Traffic-Shaping Calculations I'm trying to figure out the calculations for the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay Traffic-Shaping Calculations

2009-02-13 Thread Christopher Clouse
I'm trying to figure out the calculations for the frame-relay traffic-shaping parameters. In the Volume 1 Workbook, it states that cir and mincir should 95% of the PVC speed. I'm set for that one, but how do you get the Bc? I've found reference that it should be CIR/8=Bc. But all of the conf

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame relay traffic-shaping

2007-12-24 Thread Matthew Cody
I'd probably point you to the QoS SRND for a full discussion, but I had thought that the fragmentation-delay command was only for PPP? I will be in very bad trouble if I get caught doing this today (12/24), but check this out: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame relay traffic-shaping

2007-12-23 Thread Balamurugan Singaram
Hi, In frame relay traffic shaping, when we should use fragmentation-delay or frame-relay fragmentation. Could you please explain this both in detail? Thanks, Bala. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic shaping

2007-12-17 Thread Tyson Scott
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Monasmith Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:42 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic shaping Is there a difference/preference to configure shaping on Frame-Relay with Class-based vs. Map-Class Frame-Relay? policy-m

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic shaping

2007-12-17 Thread Scott Monasmith
Is there a difference/preference to configure shaping on Frame-Relay with Class-based vs. Map-Class Frame-Relay? policy-map FRTS class class-default shape average 729600 72960 0 VS. map-class frame-relay FRTS frame-relay cir 729600 frame-relay bc 7296 frame-relay be - frame-relay mincir 7