gt;
> Take care, All the best.
>
> --
> *From:* Hesham Abdelkereem
> *To:* vignesh sethuraman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 March 2013 12:38 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
>
> Wow nice over there:)
> I like Sw
s
Michael Sears
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas MICHEL [mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:10 AM
To: Sears, Michael (msears)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE
Hi Michael
Check that the device pool associa
Hi Michael
Check that the device pool associated to the trunk got a Call Manager
group with both Pub and Sub.
Beside of that I don't know
Regards
PS: Never ask to answer ASAP please :) We are like you and owe nothing
but help if we can :)
Nic
Le Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:43:06
Greetings All. I'm having an unusual issue with my Gatekeeper which I have not
seen before.
My gatekeeper is on the mgcp HQ router. When I do "show gatekeeper end" I only
see GK_Trunk_1, the publisher and CME. The Subscriber is missing. I have
reset the trunk and gatekeeper many times. A
; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Tamer,
Can you supply the following?
-sh gatek endp
-sh gatek gw-ty
Thank you,
Amy
---
Amy Ryan - CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
0 +0200
To:
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Hello Experts,
I have problem in integrating GK with CUCM and BR2, showing below all
configuration I made for the integration.
The problem in prefix #1 the only prefix register on GW (3 is not, which
should come from BR2).
And also CUCM pub is
Hello Experts,
I have problem in integrating GK with CUCM and BR2, showing below all
configuration I made for the integration.
The problem in prefix #1 the only prefix register on GW (3 is not, which
should come from BR2).
And also CUCM pub is the old server register to GK (sub is not).
P
Jeff,
You were using trunks as terminal. I seem to remember that terminals can
not specify a tech prefix. Change the type to VOIP-GW and give it a try.
Bo
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Jeff Price (jeffpric)
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I am having trouble with my GK. I have made *Bol
...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Price
(jeffpric)
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 5:54 PM
To: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Hi everyone,
I am having trouble with my GK. I have made Bold what is the problem,
but I can&#
mail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100525/b50
0a27a/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:53:56 -0500
From: "J
Hi everyone,
I am having trouble with my GK. I have made Bold what is the problem,
but I can't seem to understand why I'm having this issue. I configured
a tech-prefix of 1# under the Trunk configuration page.
Here is the config -
gatekeeper
zone local ZONE_1 asccie.com 10.
igned the trunk to the
correct DP, and the correct bandwidth was then requested.
Jeff
From: Angel Perez [mailto:gorr...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 2:17 AM
To: afat...@verizon.net; Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Cc: osl osl
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Hello:
:47 -0800
> From: afat...@verizon.net
> To: jeffp...@cisco.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
>
> whats the direction of call? Previous debug has bandwidth 160, which is
> 16k for g729 and this one is showing bandwidt
] On Behalf Of kavi ten
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 8:12 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Hi Jeff,
Please chk the Tech prefix on the CUCM ,
If its set to 1# , then u need to send 1 # along with the no from CME &
remove it at the GW
Hi Jeff,
Please chk the Tech prefix on the CUCM ,
If its set to 1# , then u need to send 1 # along with the no from CME &
remove it at the GW with incoming allowed nos or use TP.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, plea
ks again.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:49 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
whats the direction of call? Previous debug has bandwidth 160, which is
16k fo
7752011001
>>
>
> The pattern I've configured on CUCM is expecting to receive in the form
> 17752011001. This output almost makes it seem like only 7752011001 is
> being sent, is this correct? I'm going to try to add another pattern
> without the 1 so that I ca
your help.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Price
(jeffpric)
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:38 PM
To: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Here is the
t]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
GK seems to be routing the call. Do you get a busy tone when the call is
unsuccessful? Have you configured an xcoder anyway on CME?
-- Mustafa
Jeff Price (jeffpr
riday, February 19, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
GK seems to be routing the call. Do you get a busy tone when the call is
unsuccessful? Have you configured an xcoder anyway on CME?
-- Mustafa
Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:
//GK/gk_process:
> QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
> R1#
> *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
> TIMER event
>
> *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers
>
> *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ///
f
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:09 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Jeff,
Do a "debug gatekeeper main 10" on the gatekeeper and check/s
Jeff,
Do a "debug gatekeeper main 10" on the gatekeeper and check/send the
output when you make a call. It will tell you whats happening and if
there is a routing failure at the gatekeeper.
Also, take a look at this documentation
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/cubegk/configuration/g
shoot this.
>
> Thanks
> Kalyan
>
>
> From: To: Roger Källberg <
> roger.kallb...@cygate.se>, "o...@ipexpert.com" , "
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" , "
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com" <
> ccie_voice-boun...@online
voice@onlinestudylist.com"
, "ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com"
Date:
02/19/2010 12:02 PM
Subject:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
Sent by:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Hi Roger,
Thanks for replying.
It adds the star by default when you pu
___
> Från: Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com]
> Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28
> Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
>
>
c Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
Från: Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28
Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gate
-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
Hi Kevin,
According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn
remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would
like to
Message-
From: " Kevin Hobson"
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42
To:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10. After this the timer
expi
I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10. After this the timer
expires on the UCM and fails to complete.
See below:
HQ-RTR
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Tech-
uary 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN
GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 no
REVERT button and
the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 <http://172.9.100.1/> ip
address.
Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same
issue.
From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc:
Subjec
Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN
configuration error? gateway config is correct.
On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh &l
will wait for
Mark of Vik to comment though.
Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today
this just blew my confidence away.
From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
y 06, 2008 7:56 PM
> *To:* Patel, Mrugesh
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
>
>
>
> Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration
> error? gateway config is correct.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/6/08, *Patel, Mrugesh* <
PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration
error? gateway config is correct.
On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark,
I reverted the HQ gateway configs usi
PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue
Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your local zone
(and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK) is incorrect. I
beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1.
Mark Snow
Sr
Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN
GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1.
Mark Snow
Sr Technical Instructor
IPexpert, Inc.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:
I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.
Here is the trace. Any ideas?
I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.
My configs
gatekeeper
zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1
zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719
no zone
39 matches
Mail list logo
