Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC

2011-05-30 Thread Cristobal Priego
ying to do. The PG did not specify > anything specific as well. > > Should I not worry about this? > > Randall > > > > > -- > *From:* Roger Carpio > *To:* Randall Crumm > *Cc:* Online Study > *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC

2011-05-30 Thread Randall Crumm
bject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC That should do it. If they do not show the requested port after adding the trunk name to the service parameter I would try resetting the trunk; resetting CCM service, gatekeeper shut/no shut etc. Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC

2011-05-30 Thread Roger Carpio
nline Study > *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question > > CCM service "Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720"; > just type the trunk name. > > Rgs, > Roger Carpio. > > On Mon, May 30,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC

2011-05-30 Thread Randall Crumm
and 33277. This is what I am trying to do. The PG did not specify anything specific as well. Should I not worry about this? Randall From: Roger Carpio To: Randall Crumm Cc: Online Study Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Pablo Meneses
Randall, Add the name of the GK-controlled trunk on the service parameter named "Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720", then restart the Trunk. -Pablo Meneses. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm wrote: > Hi, > How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread ccieforme
CCM service parameter under h323 section -Original Message- From: Randall Crumm Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:39:19 To: Online Study Reply-To: Randall Crumm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Roger Carpio
CCM service "Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720"; just type the trunk name. Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm wrote: > Hi, > How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720? > > Thanks, > Randall > > HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Bill Lake
go to service parameters in Publisher, select your Pub, then call manager active, search for 1720 and you will find it. There you put the name of your gatekeeper controlled trunk. In your case it looks like you got it named gk-trunk so use that or any other name you made your trunk. On Mon, May

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Naoufal Kerboute
Behalf Of Randall Crumm Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:39 PM To: Online Study Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question Hi, How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720? Thanks, Randall HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Nirvair Sahota
In callmanager "system --> service parameters' search on 1720 and and replace 'None' with  'gk-trunk' --- On Mon, 5/30/11, Randall Crumm wrote: From: Randall Crumm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question To: "Online Study" Date: Monday, May

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Chevy
Go to UCM service parameters and search for trunk. Then enter the name of your trunk, save and then reset your trunk. Thanks, Chevy On May 30, 2011 1:30 PM, "Randall Crumm" wrote: > Hi, > How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720? > > Thanks, > Randall > > HQ-RTR(config)#do show gate

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2011-05-30 Thread Randall Crumm
Hi, How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2  to repflect port 1720? Thanks, Randall HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3*   Zone HQ master gateway list:     10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#*   Zone HQ master gateway list:     10.10.210.10:40

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Question

2010-02-05 Thread Bas Janssen
Hi Ravindra, Can you show us the GK config and the output of show gatek end and sh gatek gw I think you need a zone prefix command under the GK config. regards, Bas Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 23:20:02 +0530 From: lakpr...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Question

2010-02-04 Thread Ravindra Lakpriya
Hello guys, i was doing some testing on Gatekeeper configurations. i manage to register GW's to the GK without any error. in those GW's i was running CME. So all the endpoint data is send to GK. and from the GK end we can see the CME end point details. I can make the calls using the GK with out a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Chris Parker
Wouldn't be the first time :-) CCIE OSL wrote: I hope, you are not dreaming about it! /Jin Jung... Chris Parker wrote: Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Cliff McGlamry
It's not needed to accomplish this. But if told to use it to accomplish some other requirementmaybe. It would just depend. - Original Message - From: "CCIE OSL" To: "Cliff McGlamry" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:23 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_V

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread CCIE OSL
I hope, you are not dreaming about it! /Jin Jung... Chris Parker wrote: Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I kept thinking

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Chris Parker
Cliff, This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-) Good work Chris Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I kept thinking about it. Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documen

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread CCIE OSL
Hey, Cliff, Man! First, Thanks for all you time on this. I see your method, and it's wonderful that this works.. One question, Let's say, if you are allow to use bandwidth command on Gk, would you use same method?? bandwidth interzone 16 /Jin Jung... Cliff McGlamry wrote: This bugged me. I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - follow up - ACTUAL SOLUTION

2009-03-31 Thread Cliff McGlamry
This bugged me. I kept thinking about it. Went back and started googling for some additional gatekeeper documentation. Found what I was looking for. To summarize the problem as I understand it: 1. Trunks coming in from CCM to GK. Trunk to sub is priority for incoming calls from GK. 2.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution

2009-03-31 Thread Cliff McGlamry
zone prefixes. That's about all I can do with it. - Original Message - From: "CCIE OSL" To: "Cliff McGlamry" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:21 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution Thanks Cliff, I was planning to pu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution

2009-03-31 Thread CCIE OSL
m:* kapil atrish <mailto:nice_cha...@yahoo.com> *To:* CCIE OSL <mailto:ccie...@gmail.com> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com <mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> *Sent:* Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:37 AM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question H

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question - possible solution

2009-03-30 Thread Cliff McGlamry
ination-pattern 1... session target ras tech-prefix 3# dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad - Original Message - From: kapil atrish To: CCIE OSL Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:37 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread kapil atrish
nfig would be straight forward: zone-prefix GK 1* gw-priority 10 Sub_Trunk_1 zone-prefix GK 1* gw-priority 9 Pub_Trunk_2 --- On Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL wrote: From: CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "kapil atrish" Cc: "ccie Me" , ccie_voic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread CCIE OSL
is already active on Sub, any subsequent call from Site C will not be allowed due to b/w limitation over that trunk (Location). Next call should fall back to Pub trunk which is having gw-priority 9. Thanks... --- On *Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL //* wrote: From: CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CC

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread kapil atrish
You are absolutely righttwo ccm groups required having one ccm in each. --- On Sun, 3/29/09, anil batra wrote: From: anil batra Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "ccie Me" , "CCIE OSL" , "kapil atrish" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.co

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread anil batra
trish wrote: From: kapil atrish Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "ccie Me" , "CCIE OSL" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 10:55 AM You can try this: Create two trunks between CCM and GK having only one CCM in each trunk i.e

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread kapil atrish
imitation over that trunk (Location). Next call should fall back to Pub trunk which is having gw-priority 9. Thanks... --- On Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL wrote: From: CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question To: "ccie Me" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sun

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread CCIE OSL
I have some questions for you. 1. Are you running on 1 tech-prefix or two with on the gatekeeper? 2. Does entire BR2 has to able to call HQ or just a single phone? 3. Does it required to only use 1#, are you allow to use other prefixes? Your first requirement for HQ to BR2 is fairly easy, Howeve

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread Scott ODonnell
Don't know for sure but . Under the gatekeeper config :Look at the command "endpoint max-calls h323id" On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, ccie Me wrote: > Gents, > > i'm working on this case on gatekeeper: > > i need to only allow ONE active call that should be going through SUB > now for a

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question

2009-03-28 Thread ccie Me
Gents, i'm working on this case on gatekeeper: i need to only allow ONE active call that should be going through SUB now for  any other new call if: -  it is from HQ to SiteC via GK it will be rejected by GK and rerouted to pstn via 6608 on HQ -  if it is from SitC  to HQ via GK it will g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2008-03-24 Thread Vik Malhi
Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jane Ryer (jryer) Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:04 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question Sorry, correcting my typos

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2008-03-24 Thread Jane Ryer (jryer)
@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question Hi, Daniel, I have also been working my way through Exam II recently, and came to the same conclusion that you did - that the solution is wrong. Here's what I ended up with, which seems to work: RL-GK-ADD-P

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2008-03-24 Thread Jane Ryer (jryer)
cie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question I'm working through Exam II from recent Ipexpert bootcamp (which was excellent by the way). I'm not sure if there is an error the solutions guide for a question, or I'm just not understanding. On question 19

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question

2008-03-23 Thread Daniel Dellinger
I'm working through Exam II from recent Ipexpert bootcamp (which was excellent by the way). I'm not sure if there is an error the solutions guide for a question, or I'm just not understanding. On question 19 (exam II) it states that " International calls from both Call Manager sites to German