Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-30 Thread Kapuria, Aman
@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS Hi Aman, In case this help, the topic seems to be discussed before. E.g. in the following thread. - http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg06632.html - http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-28 Thread Kapuria, Aman
But voice packets font get fragmented when you use frf.12. So why would you use 8 and not 4? On 28/06/2013, at 2:07 PM, Suresh Bhandari bring...@gmail.commailto:bring...@gmail.com wrote: As you've read in the QoS SRND, you use 8byte overhead for the FRF.12. Further, somewhere I read that +5 -

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-28 Thread Suresh Bhandari
As you've read in the QoS SRND, you use 8byte overhead for the FRF.12. Further, somewhere I read that +5 - 10% bandwidth over-provisioning is okay. So, you can use a bandwidth equal to 48k, for four concurrent calls, for example. HTH On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Kapuria, Aman

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-28 Thread Somphol Boonjing
Hi Aman, In case this help, the topic seems to be discussed before. E.g. in the following thread. - http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg06632.html - http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg31952.html Regards, --Somphol. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-28 Thread Somphol Boonjing
Hi Aman, But voice packets font get fragmented when you use frf.12. So why would you use 8 and not 4? Just to try to dig up some relevant information. *[1] On whether voice packet get fragmented.* I agreed fully with you. If configured correctly, the voice packet should not be fragemented.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-28 Thread Somphol Boonjing
Just one more thing I forget to highlight. FRF.12 specification page 9 ( http://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/FRF.12/frf12.pdf), stated that NLPID field must be set to 0xB1 to signify that the frame contains a fragment. Then, it make more sense to assume that the NLPID field exists

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-27 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Anyone? Aman From: Kapuria, Aman Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013 3:31 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: L2 overhead for QoS Hi All, What L2 overhead do you use for frf.12 and MLP when you calculate number of calls over a link? Different providers have different approach around

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] L2 overhead for QoS

2013-06-26 Thread Kapuria, Aman
Hi All, What L2 overhead do you use for frf.12 and MLP when you calculate number of calls over a link? Different providers have different approach around this. QoS SRND says Frame Relay adds 4 bytes of Layer 2 overhead; Frame Relay with FRF.12 adds 8 bytes. With frf.12 voice packets don't get