Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-08 Thread cciev wannabe
Ignore whatever the report says. I took a few times already and felt exactly like you. Another thing is all the LAB I got looks very passable but I failed because I run out of time every single time. For all who taking soon, practice your SPEED. CCIE voice is a speed test. Don't worry about techno

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Martin
t > > ** ** > > *From:* Emanuel Damasceno [mailto:aedamasc...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:05 PM > *To:* Thomas Koch > > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading > > ** ** > > Hey Thomas! &

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-07 Thread datucha123 datucha123
You are right Emanuel. I am a native neglish speaker, and sometimes it is hard for me to understand some task, while rereading them several times On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote: > Hey Vega, > > Sorry for hearing you didn't make it. I've been there and I know the > feelin

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-07 Thread Thomas Koch
PM To: Thomas Koch Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading Hey Thomas! I am using the Device Based Approach by Matthew Berry. You can see it on Youtube. My strategy is as follows: I get one Lab from workbook 2 and start reading it. Then I write d

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-07 Thread Emanuel Damasceno
: digito...@comcast.net > > ** ** > > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Emanuel Damasceno > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:13 AM > *To:* Vega Wong > *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-07 Thread Emanuel Damasceno
Hey Vega, Sorry for hearing you didn't make it. I've been there and I know the feeling. I am preparing myself for my second attempt now. I don't know which strategies you used, but all areas you mentioned there are tricks that confuse us. I think the whole point of the exam is understanding and d

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Martin
It is definitely tough, I know I felt pretty lost too after my first attempt. For me taking a couple weeks off and going back 6 weeks later helped immensely. I felt I knew the technology and had the speed to succeed, so instead of doing a bunch of 8 hour labs, I really focused on how to verify eac

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-06 Thread Vega Wong
Hi all First of all, let me clarify that I am not trying to break NDA or trying to sell anything here, just something I cant get my head around with. I just had my second attmpt yesterday, and I failed. What really demoralising for me is that I thought I was fully prepared. What even more demo

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Grading

2012-02-06 Thread Ken Wyan
I read an ipexpert blog by Anthony Squera " You should understand how grading proctor evaluates your lab " Specifically for CCIE Voice most labs locations are graded by a remote proctor in a different time zone. Grading should be based on whether your solution fullfills question requirements r

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-23 Thread Scott ODonnell
>>> infrastructure of all things. I got like a 60% in each of those. My >>> 6500 kept locking up in my lab, and now I have to wonder if that >>> didn't some how get me. Like maybe the 6500 locked up while the lab >>> was being graded... >>> >>&

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-23 Thread Kumar, Narinder
Chris Parker Sent: Wednesday, 24 December 2008 10:29 AM To: Mike Stevenson Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading Thanks, Mike. I think you are right about reading everything closely and looking into the question. I think to a certain extent I get myself into auto pilot where I

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-23 Thread Chris Parker
n what about the rest the qos,... - Original Message - From: "Chris Parker" To: Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 7:17 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading Hello, Well I have just received my results from my last attempt on Thursday, and I didn't make it this time.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-23 Thread James Key
PM To: Chris Parker Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading Chris, I can understand your frustration, it took me 4 attempts. I thought that technically I should have passed them all :-). The thing I found the hardest (once I had speed and technical skills sorted) was learning to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-23 Thread Mike Stevenson
December 21, 2008 7:17 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading Hello, Well I have just received my results from my last attempt on Thursday, and I didn't make it this time. Unlike previous attempts I thought that I had made it this time and while I did do much better, it still wasn&#x

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-22 Thread Chris Parker
arker" To: Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 7:17 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading Hello, Well I have just received my results from my last attempt on Thursday, and I didn't make it this time. Unlike previous attempts I thought that I had made it this time and while I did

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-21 Thread Michael Shavrov
iginal Message - From: "Chris Parker" To: Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 12:17 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading Hello, Well I have just received my results from my last attempt on Thursday, and I didn't make it this time. Unlike previous attempts I thought that I

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading

2008-12-21 Thread Chris Parker
Hello, Well I have just received my results from my last attempt on Thursday, and I didn't make it this time. Unlike previous attempts I thought that I had made it this time and while I did do much better, it still wasn't enough. Which is what leaves me a bit puzzled this time around. I fi

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab grading system - partial marks

2008-10-28 Thread rob
Hi, I'm a little confused on how the lab is graded. I was under the impression that 'no partial marks' meant that if a task was missed you would fail an entire section. Although I can successfully integrate IPCCX with CCM I'm thinking about dropping this section from my lab as my weakness is scr